He is only saying that because to admit to considering it severely harms Labour in the eyes of the electorate and a week today (Friday) it will be a different story.
I sincerely hope you're wrong. For him to do that would require someone with extremely low intelligence , a total absence of integrity and complete myopia when it comes to a long term political career.He is only saying that because to admit to considering it severely harms Labour in the eyes of the electorate and a week today (Friday) it will be a different story.
Even if Miliband does the unthinkable and tries to form a coalition with the SNP (even if not in so many words), he has no mandate to do so unless Cameron concedes he cannot gain sufficient additional support to form a majority coalition government, or even a minority government with a viable basis for support on a supply and confidence basis.Even though the cons are expected to win the most seats, the bookies firmly believe that Millipede will cobble together the next govt.
I'm of a similar mind sir, but there was a chap in the audience that felt that was all Cameron had discussed and wanted him instead to talk about the moral side of his policies. I had ta catch meself from blurting out a unkindness. Ya have ta be in a relatively comfortable place yourself to be able ta afford such the luxury of philosophical ruminations and me guess is, that chap was in that place precisely because the current government have done a fair job of things. He'll be worrying about the moral dilemma sure enough when he's eating grass and finding a nice cardboard box ta settle inta for the night.So hopefully Cameron did enough to persuade the audience that the only thing that really matters is the economy !
Even if Miliband does the unthinkable and tries to form a coalition with the SNP (even if not in so many words), he has no mandate to do so unless Cameron concedes he cannot gain sufficient additional support to form a majority coalition government, or even a minority government with a viable basis for support on a supply and confidence basis.
It's all gonna depend on the actual numbers obviously.
Jokin aside, how the hell did he get elected ta lead the party anyhow? I mean, the man is a total joke.
It was an entirely democratic process where the unions used their "block" voting strength to oust his brother who unfortunately was only able to rely on a "one man = one vote" approach.
Oh the other thing. Watching Mr. MiliBean last night, he’d obviously been choreographed by his Human Dynamics Team. “Step off the podium and toward the people when answering a question.” The only problem with that is you could see the people in the front row showing signs of emotional discomfort and even fear as he lurched towards them. They didn’t know if he’d manage to pull up in time or fall headlong into them or if he’d try and kiss them or some such. Unnerving experience for em all.
And then his almost psychotic insistence on knowin your name. You could see people really uncomfortable giving him anything so personal in case he hung around after the show and try to be friends with them or follow them home and stalk them. He has that look about him.
And after 28 minutes of him movin around and on and off that bloody podium like Michael Flatley with motor neurone, he stumbles off the bloody thing on his way out. What a fitting end to his pantomime performance.
Are you aware of how much additional tax revenues will accrue from Mr. MiliBean's 'closing tax loopholes'?
No but I know it has to be done. There is a lot of b0ll0cks about if we tax the rich fat cats and cut their salaries they'll go elsewhere. Really now???
Let them. Had enough of BS to last me a life time.
We need a clear and fair taxation system. Look what happened to Ireland with its daft incentives for corporation tax. It can cut for you and against.
Do it right and be fair.
Dramatic differences between top and bottom earners skew the markets and staunts growth. On oneside there are billionaires not paying tax and on the other food banks.
Better fairer distribution of income benefits all people.
Agree.
Only one good point I can make about Labour is that I support them on closing tax loopholes for the mega rich. Don't trust them but I think they'll try.
On the other hand all this price/wage fixing can get out of hand to appease the unions.
Either way I have a dreadful feeling they will mesh up the economy. My accountant used to loath Mr Brown saying everything had gotten so messy with him.
I like the German model of continuity. How many leaders have they had in the last 30 years compared to us?
Really hoping Conservatives and Liberals continue the pact. Devil you know is better than the one you don't.
Really Now !!!
Just hop across the water to see the effects of govt policy ref soaking the rich.
The French have had enough and are indeed leaving....a lot of them coming to London
Actually I agree with you - But the Labourites want fairness - whats blooming fair about the 1 % rich paying 30% of all our taxes and to the top 10% of salary earners paying god knows about 75% of all the UK taxes .
What I would say though - all Banksters should pay 99% tax - just to even it up a bit ;-)
I was referring not to 95% taxation but loop holes and fat cat salaries where an idiot in the company earns 1000 x the salary of a cleaner.
Just as with the bottom end there is much that can be done with the top end for taking short term excessive risk.
These highly paid experts have pretty much single handedly destroyed the reputation of the city and not one person has been fired but good many left with golden hand shakes.
Foreigners coming into London and buying up exclusive properties have a habit of taking all other prices in the area up.
Yes they do spend money on good restaurants and theatres but we need a balance. The dishwasher guy may well be on a minimum wage and he may indeed be an illegal migrant under cutting the min wage but you know it skews up pretty much everything and leads to anomolies in other parts of the economy.
I don't have anything againts Jimmy Carr, very funny geezer n all that but if the tax avoidance system wasn't there he'd pay a little more tax like the rest of us right?
How about the starbucks and amazons? Being embarrassed to pay 5m tax?
How can they sell coffee without the market place? It's alright, they don't have to pay tax as long as they employ some people on min wage. This mentality has to stop.
As for the fat cat salaries, they are certainly not worth their salaries but by virtue of the fact they make up their own salaries behind closed doors we get idiots like Bob Diamond on £200m who has managed to pretty much eff-up Barclays shareholders single handed.
I wish some of you clever cloggs get a sense of common decency and call a spade a spade for what it is.
If shareholders don't see value but a diminishing return how can these clowns get bonuses. Does anyone know what a bonus is?
Not asking for favours. Asking for fairness.