matey
very generally - yes
however I believe u r still a tiny bit confused about this latest addition to our system
it is still my strong belief that the absolute value of tick is largely meaningless. Let me give u an absurd example. say u've got Tick of +300. It can be 100 major cap stocks ticking down with 400 small beer stocks ticking up, or 400 larger cap stocks charging up on the tick with 100 smallest beer
ones declining. Quite different set-ups with the same absolute value of Tick innit?
All my latest addition to the system is about - is that if u get a "proper" tick neg div sequence - BUT over the entire time of this sequence Tick never tanks below 0 (there r always more advancers than decliners) u need to tighten yr stoploss on yr Short from my usual 3.25 pts to 1.5 pts as the chances of that being just a "bull flag" and mrkt inflecting to the upside hugely increase. And it is perhaps just part of a larger tick neg div sequence in the making. THIS NEW ADDITION TO OUR SYS IS JUST FINE TUNING OF STOPLOSS MANAGEMENT!
However, I'd agree with u that on extreme readings of Tick (>1100) it is a reasonable scalp for 1.5 pts to reverse. I'd strongly advise hvng a tight stoploss on it, which of coz u can move in yr direction if it is more than just a scalp.
Matey - let me tell u something on a bigger pic. Why stoploss management is so important to me. I am fully convinced that successful trading is not about how much u make but about how much of that u keep - which in its essence is how much u lose
Hv u ever read the book called "Three Comrades" by Erich-Maria Remarck? There was a chap in that book who had bn a successful trader up until 1929, when he got washed out buying on extreme oversld readings? I bet he was fading Tick below -1200!
cheers
Martin