Trading cliches & expressions - the ones you really hate!

bad_news_on_wall_street.gif
 
Trading is a marathon, not a sprint

means.....

I know you have no idea what is going on and neither do I. I am certain you are going to get wiped out, but at least it gives me time to sell my books and courses while you think you will succeed ultimately.
 
shadowninja said:
"Register for our free trading seminar..."

= attend our two hour sales pitch where we will lie about profits we've made trading and get you to part with £2k. Where leverage is about levering the credit card out of your wallet and into our swipe machine.
Click to expand...
That sounds familiar... I once attended a seminar which followed the 2 hour 'sales pitch' pattern and found them to be less than forthcoming when I asked for references... (Incidently, I believe that threads about their seminar have recently been yanked from this website).
 
the widespread use cliche (meme)

"if any system or indicator was very good, then everyone would use it and it would negate itself" (harrumph)

widespread use meme

I read somewhere recently that any particular strategy will be skewed
if it becomes popular enough and enough people start using it.
That is indeed a widespread belief or concept. It is one of many that
are often repeated by the financial media, another one is
'you can't time the market'.
Its a meme because few people dig into asking questions about it
and its spread from person to person across the net.

I think it does not take into account the huge effect human nature
plays in its application. I've been developing a computer program
that governs my trading since late 2000 and in discussions with
other developers and users since then I have experienced many scenarios
of human nature that would prevent any system or method from becoming
so widespread that it would invalidate itself. Below is a list of
factors of human nature that would be involved.
I have seen every one take place in real life.

1. The myth that any system or method can catch every point of every
move every time. If any system or method had even one loss or drawdown,
this would cause X percent of followers to drop off in search of a
better one. If this happened on their first trade X would become a
larger percent. If there were two losers in a row, I've seen enough
posts over the years to know there would be a large exodus.
2. Along the same theme, if the system buys or sells and misses any
possible further gain, another X percent would become discouraged.
3. Along the way, you will also get people who 2nd guess the system,
and thereby miss trades and get discouraged. This also involves media
coverage making them discouraged or too optimistic versus what the
program is telling them.
4. The 2nd guessing can also take the form of pure disagreement with
the system, for instance if it said to buy at a major market low when
things looked especially gloomy or vice versa during euphoria periods.
5. How much work will it take also eliminates anther X percent of
possible system users. To illustrate this, here?s an example. Early
versions of my program took me 5 minutes per day to update. I had
several people ask me if there was any way to automate that so they
wouldn?t have to spend 5 minutes per day. Think about it.
6. You would also loss another X percent of investors due to
'the grass is greener on the other side' syndrome, wherein they would
drop off to chase a different system that looked better.
7. another X percent of people out there are religiously convinced it
can't be done at all; to the extent they will steadfastly refuse to
even look at trade receipts. Over the years I've seen about 75% of
the people who respond just quote some sound bite they once heard
saying 'you can't time the market' or must be curve-fit etc etc.
When you press them for details, many times it turns out they have
done little or no work on their own, just read an article once by a
broker who said so. If I talk to 50 people, I get perhaps 5 like him
that actually will do the diligence.
8. others feel that dollar cost averaging is the only way to go.
9. Others are all hung up on management fees to the extent that they
will ignore a 20% fund with 2% fees in favor of a 14% fund with 1% fees, because a sound bite told them fees are everything.
10. others will get all hung up with macro bear or bull projections
and miss all the intermediate moves a system could produce for them,
sometimes ending up on the wrong side of an entire run.
11. It takes money to make money, so if it takes $5,000 to trade
a given system, how many potential users did you just eliminate?
12. How many people will make some excuse to withdraw their money
because they want a new sofa? (or fill in the blank)

In short, unless it delivers 10% per month to their account in a
bank with zero risk, I say no system or indicator will ever become
that widespread because people are people.[/B]

Captain Currency said:
The trading world is full of cliches & expressions, some of them are creditable but a lot of them are just cop-outs.

Here is my attempt at cliche bashing, feel free to join in

CLICHE: "No one ever went broke taking profits"

What it really means: "I've lost the last 2 trades and my confidence is low, my latest position is up +5, I'm feeling frightened and I dont want another loser so I'm going to take profit now"
Click to expand...
 
RichieE said:
That sounds familiar... I once attended a seminar which followed the 2 hour 'sales pitch' pattern and found them to be less than forthcoming when I asked for references... (Incidently, I believe that threads about their seminar have recently been yanked from this website).
Click to expand...

Can't think which person that related to... was it a Mr Springs? No, wait, a Mr Summers? No, hang on... ah, a Mr Autumns? Oh, I give up.
 
mr_cassandra said:
"if any system or indicator was very good, then everyone would use it and it would negate itself" (harrumph)

widespread use meme

I read somewhere recently that any particular strategy will be skewed
if it becomes popular enough and enough people start using it.
That is indeed a widespread belief or concept. It is one of many that
are often repeated by the financial media, another one is
'you can't time the market'.
Its a meme because few people dig into asking questions about it
and its spread from person to person across the net.

I think it does not take into account the huge effect human nature
plays in its application. I've been developing a computer program
that governs my trading since late 2000 and in discussions with
other developers and users since then I have experienced many scenarios
of human nature that would prevent any system or method from becoming
so widespread that it would invalidate itself. Below is a list of
factors of human nature that would be involved.
I have seen every one take place in real life.

1. The myth that any system or method can catch every point of every
move every time. If any system or method had even one loss or drawdown,
this would cause X percent of followers to drop off in search of a
better one. If this happened on their first trade X would become a
larger percent. If there were two losers in a row, I've seen enough
posts over the years to know there would be a large exodus.
2. Along the same theme, if the system buys or sells and misses any
possible further gain, another X percent would become discouraged.
3. Along the way, you will also get people who 2nd guess the system,
and thereby miss trades and get discouraged. This also involves media
coverage making them discouraged or too optimistic versus what the
program is telling them.
4. The 2nd guessing can also take the form of pure disagreement with
the system, for instance if it said to buy at a major market low when
things looked especially gloomy or vice versa during euphoria periods.
5. How much work will it take also eliminates anther X percent of
possible system users. To illustrate this, here?s an example. Early
versions of my program took me 5 minutes per day to update. I had
several people ask me if there was any way to automate that so they
wouldn?t have to spend 5 minutes per day. Think about it.
6. You would also loss another X percent of investors due to
'the grass is greener on the other side' syndrome, wherein they would
drop off to chase a different system that looked better.
7. another X percent of people out there are religiously convinced it
can't be done at all; to the extent they will steadfastly refuse to
even look at trade receipts. Over the years I've seen about 75% of
the people who respond just quote some sound bite they once heard
saying 'you can't time the market' or must be curve-fit etc etc.
When you press them for details, many times it turns out they have
done little or no work on their own, just read an article once by a
broker who said so. If I talk to 50 people, I get perhaps 5 like him
that actually will do the diligence.
8. others feel that dollar cost averaging is the only way to go.
9. Others are all hung up on management fees to the extent that they
will ignore a 20% fund with 2% fees in favor of a 14% fund with 1% fees, because a sound bite told them fees are everything.
10. others will get all hung up with macro bear or bull projections
and miss all the intermediate moves a system could produce for them,
sometimes ending up on the wrong side of an entire run.
11. It takes money to make money, so if it takes $5,000 to trade
a given system, how many potential users did you just eliminate?
12. How many people will make some excuse to withdraw their money
because they want a new sofa? (or fill in the blank)

In short, unless it delivers 10% per month to their account in a
bank with zero risk, I say no system or indicator will ever become
that widespread because people are people.[/B]
Click to expand...


Much of that is called plain truth (y)
 
Tha Art of War by that Chinese bloke. Most boring book I've ever read; a best-selling extended metaphor and one mega cliche.

Grant.
 
Mr Cassandra,

An fine exposition, especially

“11. It takes money to make money, so if it takes $5,000 to trade
a given system, how many potential users did you just eliminate?"

A few years ago I had a programme that cost £400 per month to rent, and it was the best programme I’ve ever seen. Unfortunately, I was not in a position to fully exploit it (lack of funds). It was worth twice that amount, if not more.

People are naturally cynical of systems; and they don’t like to pay for anything.

Grant.
 
Depth Trade said:
"Money is the root of all evil"
Click to expand...

I hate when the phrase is misquoted in the way you have done. The original and more accurate expression is:

"For the love of money is the root of all evil"

1 Timothy 6:10 - For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil. Not the money itself, which if used as by a steward of God is a blessing, so much as the love of it. This greedy love is the source of every sin. Men murder, cheat, lie, rob, run saloons, gambling houses, brothels, all for the love of money. For love of money Judas sold his Master.
 
peto said:
I thought the point of this thread was posting cliches we don't agree with!:confused:
Click to expand...

oooops :)

I apologize as in the sense of the thread bewise was contributing CORRECTLY :-0

Here one statement from me which I don't agree with:

If in trouble, DOUBLE ;)

The road to ruin!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
My career route....
Replies
8
Views
3K
hgh
H
Yuppie
Hey Grey1, do I need to know this stuff?...
Replies
18
Views
807
Yuppie
Yuppie
Naz
Sunday Express Day trader
Replies
0
Views
2K
Naz
Naz
T
Time To Set Some Goals
Replies
11
Views
2K
tradefxlive
T
K
Can you really make a living from trading?
2
Replies
25
Views
21K
Omoh101
O
Top