The Simplest Trading Method In The World

[Bint_Crusher]

😴😴😴😴

I guess u are one of those traders using bollinger bands and wondering why you loose money everyday😆😆😆😆

You GUESS? 😆😆😆
Thats why you're looking for a strategy that works more than 50% of the time. 😆😆😆😆😆😆 The strategy doesn't exist.😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

The trading world is littered with GBL appendage vacuums looking for the same thing. Learn to trade and manage risk or become one of them.😎😎😎:smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart:😱😱😱:idea::idea::idea::idea:😗whistling😗whistling:whistling

 

[NN3]

You GUESS? 😆😆😆
Thats why you're looking for a strategy that works more than 50% of the time. 😆😆😆😆😆😆 The strategy doesn't exist.😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

The trading world is littered with GBL appendage vacuums looking for the same thing. Learn to trade and manage risk or become one of them.😎😎😎:smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart:😱😱😱:idea::idea::idea::idea:😗whistling😗whistling:whistling

We all know that there is no such strategy that works all the time but there are definitelly things which can bring an EDGE to trading. For example in last few years i was trading the news and taking advantage of brokers delays. This had around 90% edge but this is slowly dying out now...so im looking for other strategies that make sense. Not mumbo-jumbo indicators or tripple top patterns most of traders are using. They cleary have no common sense and logic behind them and im not surprised why 90% of traders are loosing money.

Anyway lack of intelligent things to say is definitelly compensated by posting smiley faces. 👎

Keep trolling😆

manage risk or become one of them

Hahaha. Is this the best you can come up with?? How excatly does risk managment give u an edge?This is excatly what is pointless. Risk managment is ok, but it doesnt work if you dont have an edge. Go into casino with best risk managment in the world and see how long you will last. Risk managment is just usefull once you ALREADY have strategy with some EDGE or logic behind

 

[Bint_Crusher]

We all know that there is no such strategy that works all the time but there are definitelly things which can bring an EDGE to trading. For example in last few years i was trading the news and taking advantage of brokers delays. This had around 90% edge but this is slowly dying out now...so im looking for other strategies that make sense. Not mumbo-jumbo indicators or tripple top patterns most of traders are using. They cleary have no common sense and logic behind them and im not surprised why 90% of traders are loosing money.

Anyway lack of intelligent things to say is definitelly compensated by posting smiley faces. 👎

Keep trolling😆





This is excatly what is pointless. Risk managment is ok, but it doesnt work if you dont have an edge. Go into casino with best risk managment in the world and see how long you will last. Risk managment is just usefull once you have strategy with some edge or logic behind

Trading the news and relying upon brokers is a bad bad bad basd basd way to trade, surprised yer broker did not eat you. The only edge you can have in trading is have a simple plan, a set of rules and forken follow them.
Risk management is everything, without it you will be crushed.

Rule: Reward to Risk has to be 3:1, stop to breakeven at 1.5. Follow that rule. Cum with me if you want to live.😈😈😈😈😈

I'll be BACK

Consider FUNDAMENTALS but NEVER TRADE THEM.
Regions where buyers/sellers are out of balance,
If Price enters this region consider previous Strength of move away, bigger picture timeframe, Reward :Risk, Retracement 1,2,3, time at the level and how it arrived back at that level.:smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart:😆😆😆😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😏😏😏😏👎👎👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Finally Treat your BROKER like you treat your BITCH
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆:innocent::innocent::innocent::innocent::innocent::innocent::innocent::innocent:😱😱😱😱😈😈😈:idea::idea::idea:😗whistling😗whistling😗whistling

 

[Rooster34]

Tom Basso used money management, trailing stops, and a few other rules to prove that you could make money on random entries using a coin toss.
If you could consistently identify 2:1 RR wins at a 50% strike rate using TA you could retire in short order and drink Krystal out of strippers shoes every day......errrr....I mean if thats your thing....

Also, not much works without massive amounts of chart time. As I'm learning.

 

[NN3]

Trading the news and relying upon brokers is a bad bad bad basd basd way to trade, surprised yer broker did not eat you.

It might seem bad way to trade but its the easiest way to come from 1k to 100k if only using regulated brokers and some tricks for hedging the trades. From 2006 until this year it was the licence to print the money for those that did it properly. In other words it had and edge.

[/B]
Risk management is everything, without it you will be crushed.

Rule: Reward to Risk has to be 3:1, stop to breakeven at 1.5. Follow that rule.

Ok, where excatly is the edge in risk managment? Risk rewards ratios depends from system to system and are not universal. But what im trying to point out is that the system must have some logic and therefore an edge. Risk managment ON ITS OWN doesnt give u any edge. Try taking random trades with 3:1 rule....after a while ur accounts will be gone due to broker fees.

Let me give u an example of an edge. For long term trend trading, following the COT data gives you an edge. Or trading arbitrage on options vs syntetic options gives you an edge. But due to the fact the most hedge fund are exploiting that very fast its almost impossible for normal traders to do options arbitrage.

Thats what i had in mind, not mumbo-jumbo indicators.

 

[Bint_Crusher]

It might seem bad way to trade but its the easiest way to come from 1k to 100k if only using regulated brokers and some tricks for hedging the trades. From 2006 until this year it was the licence to print the money for those that did it properly. In other words it had and edge.



Ok, where excatly is the edge in risk managment? Risk rewards ratios depends from system to system and are not universal. But what im trying to point out is that the system must have some logic and therefore an edge. Risk managment ON ITS OWN doesnt give u any edge. Try taking random trades😆😆😆😆😆😆😆:clap::clap: with 3:1 rule....after a while ur accounts will be gone due to broker fees.

Let me give u an example of an edge. For long term trend trading, following the COT data gives you an edge. Or trading arbitrage on options vs syntetic options gives you an edge. But due to the fact the most hedge fund are exploiting that very fast its almost impossible for normal traders to do options arbitrage.

Thats what i had in mind, not mumbo-jumbo indicators.

Bold that gives as much of an edge as it does a degree in Venereal Disease.😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆🙄🙄🙄😗whistling:whistling
Bold, Dont trade against hedge funds, recognise when they enter the market and jump on before them.👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Whats a forken "Random Trade". 😈😈😈😈😈
Regulated Brokers? Your BROKER is your BITCH according to the great and articulate scousemong Anton Kriel.

I'll be BACK

 

[NN3]

bla...bla...bla...
Regulated Brokers? Your BROKER is your BITCH according to the great and articulate scousemong Anton Kriel.

Regualted brokers pay out the profits. Or else the FSA gets them. Brokers regulated in Panama or Nigeria on the other hand give u more profit but dont pay out anything😆

"Random trade" means taking a trade without and clear logic behind it. Using bollinger bands is such example. While it might seem to work it doesnt. Small traders do not realize what looks like buy signal to some it looks like sell signal to others that are looking at diferent time frame. And besides all the pairs in forex are inter-related and they overlap.

 

[Bint_Crusher]

Regualted brokers pay out the profits. Or else the FSA gets them. Brokers regulated in Panama or Nigeria on the other hand give u more profit but dont pay out anything😆

"Random trade" means taking a trade without and clear logic behind it. Using bollinger bands is such example. While it might seem to work it doesnt. Small traders do not realize what looks like buy signal to some it looks like sell signal to others that are looking at diferent time frame. And besides all the pairs in forex are inter-related and they overlap.

:smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart::smart:
Read the earlier posts. READ READ READ them again and AGAIN.
My Broker is MY BITCH.

 

[Bint_Crusher]

Hello HELLO ,I'm sure I replied to this one.
Lady whiteadder where are you?

 

[MajorDutch]

Long at the specified point, after a big move in price, straight into a supply (resistance) area? 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
No further comment as I don't want to get banned.
😗whistling😗whistling

OWNED! wake up and taste the humble pie.

 

[Bint_Crusher]

OWNED! wake up and taste the humble pie.

Many congrats, now yer can try in a real market instead of a simulated one.
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍😗whistling😗whistling😗whistling:whistling

 

[MajorDutch]

Many congrats, now yer can try in a real market instead of a simulated one.
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍😗whistling😗whistling😗whistling:whistling

I did trade it in the real market bhatch, I closed out at break even when it came back on me. I was just proving a point that it did make 1R as there was 'room' up to the S/R bhatch.

gay boy.😆

 

[Bint_Crusher]

I did trade it in the real market bhatch, I closed out at break even when it came back on me. I was just proving a point that it did make 1R as there was 'room' up to the S/R bhatch.

gay boy.😆

And you paid yer broker the spread and made nothing yerself. If you are proud of this then you must have an incredibly minute willy.
In any case , talk english on yer next post , just like I call my BROKER is my BITCH.
😎😎😎😎😎😎😆😆😆😆😆😆

 

[Pazienza]

This is a good, lulzy debate. Keep if up bee-yotchez! 👍

 

[MajorDutch]

And you paid yer broker the spread and made nothing yerself. If you are proud of this then you must have an incredibly minute willy.
In any case , talk english on yer next post , just like I call my BROKER is my BITCH.
😎😎😎😎😎😎😆😆😆😆😆😆

I am not proud of the trade, I don't attach any emotion to a trade. I was just showing you that you were WRONG and the market proved your WRONG.

 

[scose-no-doubt]

you're

 

[Bint_Crusher]

I am not proud of the trade, I don't attach any emotion to a trade. I was just showing you that you were WRONG and the market proved your WRONG.

You published it, it hit a resistance area then bounced back to breakeven, you handed your commission to your broker who should be your bitch: You would have been better off saving your money for hand for shandy services from a real live BITCH.😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

 

[MajorDutch]

You published it, it hit a resistance area then bounced back to breakeven, you handed your commission to your broker who should be your bitch: You would have been better off saving your money for hand for shandy services from a real live BITCH.😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

now you are talking some sense. call the next trade bhatch.

 

[MajorDutch]

Hey Paz

Are you short on the S&P? stops already b/e gunning for 2R on this one.

 

[Pazienza]

Hey Paz

Are you short on the S&P? stops already b/e gunning for 2R on this one.

Hey,

I don't watch H1, so I didn't see this. All this just my opinion I have to stress, so I am not saying it's wrong to take it, but I wouldn't have because:

The recent trend is bullish; the market has that kind of turning over look to it.

I'd want to see it higher, actually coming off 1200 rather than near it.

The bar itself doesn't do a lot for me - far too small.

None of that is set in stone for me, but just in general I see a small bar against a strong recent trend with few supporting factors.

Again, I don't say it's wrong to trade these. But my experience was that I began to do much better when I started passing on this kind of set up.

Seems to be working out well at the moment though 👍.