The Little Circle:Moderation

[barjon]

cyof

You may "have enjoyed it thoroughly", cyof, but can I remind you that T2W is not your personal plaything. I'm getting pretty fed-up with the constant monitoring that your posts require and to judge from the number of reported posts, so are plenty of others.

I give you the benefit of the doubt that you really do have a serious point to make amid all the clatter so I'm letting the thread run.

cheers

jon

 

[CYOF]

Thank you Jon,

And while we are now engaged in Dialouge, can you please explain to me, and everyone else, did you know what Profitaker was implying when he told me over on the Options Edge thread, and Socrates in the past, to GFY?

For we still do not know what this means, really.

Does it break any T2W rules?

Thank You Jon.

 

[barjon]

Thank you Jon,

And while we are now engaged in Dialouge, can you please explain to me, and everyone else, did you know what Profitaker was implying when he told me over on the Options Edge thread, and Socrates in the past, to GFY?

For we still do not know what this means, really.

Does it break any T2W rules?

Thank You Jon.

cyof

...as i said before - point me to the post and i'll deal with it

jon

 

[CYOF]

Ok Jon,

I would like to do it over in the Vanilla Thread, as this is where the request originated.

Can you transfer your last post + this one to the Vanilla Thread, and I will then post the link.

Thank You.

 

[CYOF]

Ok Jon,

As you want me to post it here, then here it is.

It was post #115 in The Vanilla Options thread - my mistake - it was not the Options Edge thread as I thought.

Thank You.

 

[ian]

Ok Jon,

As you want me to post it here, then here it is.

It was post #115 in The Vanilla Options thread - my mistake - it was not the Options Edge thread as I thought.

Thank You.



SNITCH!

 

[barjon]

Ok Jon,

As you want me to post it here, then here it is.

It was post #115 in The Vanilla Options thread - my mistake - it was not the Options Edge thread as I thought.

Thank You.

cyof

It's not as easy as you think to move posts between threads.

Given the nature of the exchanges at the time it's perhaps unlikely that profitaker intended any of the more innocent explanations offered thus i've edited it out.

jon

 

[CYOF]

SNITCH!

It is called Democracy - just in case you still have the blinkers on.

Why should some members be banned for using CAPITALS, and others commended for using such vulgar words - if that is what they are, but the person who wrote them seems to have gone all quiet - I wonder why

It says a lot about your way of thinking my friend, and shows that you have no interest in the rights of the ordinary man in the street, which I just so happen to have, and a BIG interest at
that.

I am not a "Follow The Crowd" man, as I am able to think for myself :idea:

 

[zupcon]

Why should some members be banned for using CAPITALS, and others commended for using such vulgar words - if that is what they are

The site guidelines make it clear that use of capitals, is generally unacceptable. If you repeatedly ignore warnings, and you wont enter into sensible debate, what other sanctions can the mods possibly take ?

At what point was someone commended (and by whom), for using vulgar language ?

regards
zu.

 

[CYOF]

Ok Jon,

As you want me to post it here, then here it is.

It was post #115 in The Vanilla Options thread - my mistake - it was not the Options Edge thread as I thought.

Thank You.

cyof

It's not as easy as you think to move posts between threads.

Given the nature of the exchanges at the time it's perhaps unlikely that profitaker intended any of the more innocent explanations offered thus i've edited it out.

jon

Your explanation on the moving around is accepted.

You explanation on the editing out is not accepted, and I am now stating that this is not a Democratic act - far from it actually.

It is signifying that certain T2W members here are getting preferential treatment to other T2W members, and that is not the correct way to run an open public discussion forum.

What we are now seeing is the usual suspects coming to the aid of the not to be found Profitaker, whom clearly broke to Very Strict Rules that have been posted in my face by Zupcon many times.

and now, when I produce the Facts, that Profitaker more than likely made a very rude and insulting comment, much worse than the use of any CAPITALS, what does the moderator do, go and back up the person whio broke the rules, and then says, with a smile:

"Given the nature of the exchanges at the time it's perhaps unlikely that Profitaker intended any of the more innocent explanations offered thus i've edited it out."

Well, all I can say is that - That Sums It All Up

Your actions have indeed shown the way that the powers that be Think around here, and that way of thinking is not in the best interests of ALL members, for it is now clear, very very clear indeed.

Thank you Jon for clearing it up - I had no doubts all along, but you have now shown to all that the Truth will Always prevail - it is always only a matter of time - guaranteed.

 

[ian]

I am not a "Follow The Crowd" man, as I am able to think for myself :idea:

Is that why you rely on the services of a 'select group'?

 

[CYOF]

Your explanation on the moving around is accepted.

You explanation on the editing out is not accepted, and I am now stating that this is not a Democratic act - far from it actually.

It is signifying that certain T2W members here are getting preferential treatment to other T2W members, and that is not the correct way to run an open public discussion forum.

What we are now seeing is the usual suspects coming to the aid of the not to be found Profitaker, whom clearly broke to Very Strict Rules that have been posted in my face by Zupcon many times.

and now, when I produce the Facts, that Profitaker more than likely made a very rude and insulting comment, much worse than the use of any CAPITALS, what does the moderator do, go and back up the person whio broke the rules, and then says, with a smile:

"Given the nature of the exchanges at the time it's perhaps unlikely that Profitaker intended any of the more innocent explanations offered thus i've edited it out."

Well, all I can say is that - That Sums It All Up

Your actions have indeed shown the way that the powers that be Think around here, and that way of thinking is not in the best interests of ALL members, for it is now clear, very very clear indeed.

Thank you Jon for clearing it up - I had no doubts all along, but you have now shown to all that the Truth will Always prevail - it is always only a matter of time - guaranteed.

I do not believe this

You have now deleted my image post showing what Profitaket said.

This is nothing short of outrageous

Why have you deleted this, and if I post the image again, will you give me your word that you will not delete it again, and if not, why not?

This really is unbelievable

 

[dbphoenix]

Any particular reason why this silliness can't be moved to the Foyer? Surely no one can argue that there's anything of substance here.

 

[ducati998]

Seconded, move this nonsense out of the *psychology* section.
jog on
d998

 

[SOCRATES]

Any particular reason why this silliness can't be moved to the Foyer? Surely no one can argue that there's anything of substance here.

You are dead right .......there is nothing of substance here,...... that is because you have just arrived and put yourself right in it... meddling in matters that do not concern you as usual.

 

[trendie]

Any particular reason why this silliness can't be moved to the Foyer? Surely no one can argue that there's anything of substance here.

seconded.
move along now, move along, theres nothing to see.

Could this gentleman, CYOF, who is outraged at the thought of an offensive post against him, be the one and very same gentleman who posted "FECK" and "Feck Off" (the latter as an image in his signature) earlier today.

The, DELETING those posts.

Hypocrite? Surely not.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

The spill-over into here of the Vanilla Options and Thinking Correctly threads, reminds me of the final scenes in Blazing Saddles, where a fight breaks out, and spills over into loads of other film-sets.

barjon: you deserve a medal for your restraint.

 

[CYOF]

seconded.
move along now, move along, theres nothing to see.

Could this gentleman, CYOF, who is outraged at the thought of an offensive post against him, be the one and very same gentleman who posted "FECK" and "Feck Off" (the latter as an image in his signature) earlier today.

The, DELETING those posts.

Hypocrite? Surely not.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

The spill-over into here of the Vanilla Options and Thinking Correctly threads, reminds me of the final scenes in Blazing Saddles, where a fight breaks out, and spills over into loads of other film-sets.

barjon: you deserve a medal for your restraint.

Feck and Feck Off are terms used from a very good television show called Father Ted, in case you have never heard of this brilliant programme.

Oh, and FYI (and this is a good abbreviation) my images were deleted by the mods, again, as I was happy to leave them there for some humour, which is nearly non-existent on this site.

What we are now seeing is the usual suspects gathering, as usual, to take down the ordinary man in the street.

This site is biased -period - and is spiralling downwards fast.

 

[dbphoenix]

barjon: you deserve a medal for your restraint.

Restraint, however, merely prolongs what is a pointless thread. CYOF will continue to bait and taunt the moderator until CY gets what he wants. He can then "prove" (though no one but he and his tiny posse will care) that he was/is right. In the meantime, all of this is on the front page, doing little to enhance the image of t2w.

 

[trendie]

Feck and Feck Off are terms used from a very good television show called Father Ted, in case you have never heard of this brilliant programme.

What we are now seeing is the usual suspects gathering, as usual, to take down the ordinary man in the street.

This site is biased -period.

I too am familiar with this excellent program.

Its about a worldly-wise priest, who is seen as the pillar of the community, and thought to possess an insight in matters metaphysical, but in truth is a self-serving hustler with an eye to the main chance - Father The-money-was-just-resting-in-my-account Ted. he can be quite philosophical when he wants to be.

Then there is Father Dougal. He is a dim-witted acolyte, who takes as gospel anything he is told by Father Ted, since he is now a member of an elite group, a man of the cloth.
It is not difficult to see how Father Dougal is easily led, and has a tendency to re-iterate the same old simplistic garbage Father Ted tells him.

Remind you of anyone?

 

[barjon]

I do not believe this

You have now deleted my image post showing what Profitaket said.

This is nothing short of outrageous

Why have you deleted this, and if I post the image again, will you give me your word that you will not delete it again, and if not, why not?

This really is unbelievable

cyof

Yes, I did. Since I edited the original post your image showed a post that no longer exists. I would have merely edited it if you had quoted it but I couldn't edit an image so it went.

As for bias, most pms I get complain that I am being too lenient with you. You can't win at moderating.

I think people are right to say that talking about all this has taken your thread wildly off-topic - preferably it should all be deleted, but I'm happy to split it off into T2W Feedback if you would prefer.

jon