they didnt take any penny from clients , did you read ?!!
They passed on negative slippage but retained positive slippage. Net result was clients were 600k worse off and they have been fined and ordered to pay back the 600k.
they didnt take any penny from clients , did you read ?!!
They passed on negative slippage but retained positive slippage. Net result was clients were 600k worse off and they have been fined and ordered to pay back the 600k.
first of all this fine has nothing to do with negative slippage , it is about some of the unpaid positive slippage b4 Fxcm changes the way they treat positive slippage during the NDD process at Aug 2010 , check this :
"FXCM’s platforms display the best bid/ask spread streamed from the firm’s liquidity providers plus FXCM’s mark-up. Every FXCM NDD forex trade is automatically offset in a two-step process, designed to ensure that FXCM does not profit from a trader’s losses. In the first step of the execution process, a trader clicks on the price and the order is sent to FXCM. In the second step, FXCM automatically sends the client’s order to one of its liquidity providers to offset the trade.
FXCM’s execution system prior to August 2010 only offered price improvements to clients in the first step of the process. If a better price became available on FXCM’s platform in the fraction of a second after the client submitted the order but before the order was received by FXCM, the client would benefit from the price improvement. However, FXCM’s previous execution system did not provide clients with price improvements in the second step of the execution process, even if FXCM was able to offset the order at a better price, excluding FXCM’s markup. FXCM enhanced the execution system in 2010 so that clients now benefit from price improvements in both steps of a transaction for all order types"
'slippage malpractices' - I'm afraid when the words malpractice and fines are used in the same sentence, I do get suspicious. The article also goes on to say that the malpractice is similar to using the Virtual Dealing plugin.
Virtual dealing plugin has nothing to do with Fxcm fine , the quote "malpractices" is not mentioned in the NFA fine it is forexmagntes article author own words !
I know it was the writer's words and he has expressed his opinion that it is a similar malpractise to using the Virtual Dealing plugin.
read
read
How about the word 'defrauded' from a previous CFTC case? Youre fighting a losing battle trying to defend this lot.
What this has to do with our topic , i am not defending them i dont care about Fxcm , all i said there is nothing suspicious regarding the NFA fine .
I like this bit the best...."all i said there is nothing suspicious regarding the NFA fine"
as expected the stock rallies 7%nothing suspicious here i wouldn't worry ...
Setting up a lovely new swing highish bull trap?
They passed on negative slippage but retained positive slippage. Net result was clients were 600k worse off and they have been fined and ordered to pay back the 600k.
Jason
When are FXCM going to reduce their currently wide spreads to fall in line with other SB companies?
Thanks TS
Hi TS,
I know I've posted this before but to reiterate, FXCM maintains a no re-quote policy for stock indices, metals, and oil. We will offer the lowest spread possible in order to maintain this policy.
I can announce that we have reduced the spread on the AUS200 stock index over the weekend down to 1 pip during local market hours and 2 pips out of hours.
-Jason