Come off it. My guess is that this is how it may work. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
(1) A front company with limited liability makes an offer to a farmer or farmers to buy their land (with an appropriate suspensive clause in case not enough money is raised to pay the offered price). If all goes wrong, the front company goes bankrupt and investors (as well as the farmers) get screwed -- the money they paid, allocated by creative accountants to plausible accounts, actually sits safely in the Cayman Islands or some such place. Limited liability is a wonderful thing -- somebody should compose a song for it.
(2) If enough money is received to conclude the deal, the property is sold to another front company (cut-out number 2) that undertakes the development, perhaps doing various things that slip past those entrusted with regulating new developments. As soon as the development is completed, this company ceases to exist. Cayman islands etc. Cut-out number 2.
(3) When the owners of the properties start complaining to the local authorities about things going wrong, they are adviused that they were party to all sorts of things and had best keep quiet.
(4) Eventually SJ Group goes gently into that good night of limited liability and in due course a new company is born.
Just a guess, no harm intended.
(1) A front company with limited liability makes an offer to a farmer or farmers to buy their land (with an appropriate suspensive clause in case not enough money is raised to pay the offered price). If all goes wrong, the front company goes bankrupt and investors (as well as the farmers) get screwed -- the money they paid, allocated by creative accountants to plausible accounts, actually sits safely in the Cayman Islands or some such place. Limited liability is a wonderful thing -- somebody should compose a song for it.
(2) If enough money is received to conclude the deal, the property is sold to another front company (cut-out number 2) that undertakes the development, perhaps doing various things that slip past those entrusted with regulating new developments. As soon as the development is completed, this company ceases to exist. Cayman islands etc. Cut-out number 2.
(3) When the owners of the properties start complaining to the local authorities about things going wrong, they are adviused that they were party to all sorts of things and had best keep quiet.
(4) Eventually SJ Group goes gently into that good night of limited liability and in due course a new company is born.
Just a guess, no harm intended.
@ pboyles, anley & others
It seems that in your noble pursuit to expose rogue organisations your subjectivity has over-ridden the obligation you have to your post-readers. Surely you agree with the requirement to do proper research on the companies you hastily tar with the same brush, wilfully quoting inaccuracies and insulting any individual who dares question your basis, which is a travesty no different to the scams you try to expose. One specific example is that of SJ Capital, which you have accused of being a “land-banking” scam. I am the MD of SJ Capital (SA) and wish to repudiate several of the points you have made about our organisation. Our detailed response can be found at SJ Capital Group - Strategic Land Investment