So how much exposure do you have?Really Truth Seeker, 1% ?! How on earth do you plan on ever making substantial returns with this minimal amount of exposure? A 10% profit on a trade would amount to just a 0.1% increase in your capital.
So how much exposure do you have?Really Truth Seeker, 1% ?! How on earth do you plan on ever making substantial returns with this minimal amount of exposure? A 10% profit on a trade would amount to just a 0.1% increase in your capital.
This is trading Ross Spur not coin flipping!
Taking the no tax issue in account no. But this kind of stake size we are taking about, no way I go with SB.Do you mean you see no disadvantage trading with an SB over DMA with two trades of equal size and risk, below this size of trade?
DMA isn't all people would have you believe.
Currenex for example has scamming plug in software just like MT4.
Really Truth Seeker, 1% ?! How on earth do you plan on ever making substantial returns with this minimal amount of exposure? A 10% profit on a trade would amount to just a 0.1% increase in your capital.
DMA isn't all people would have you believe.
Currenex for example has scamming plug in software just like MT4.
A 10% profit on a account risking 1% of your capital per trade would take you 5 trades at a 1:2 risk reward profile. Come on, this is basic stuff.
Taking the no tax issue in account no. But this kind of stake size we are taking about, no way I go with SB.
Ahhhh...I understand now, you are assuming your stop will be hit at your desired price or you are using a guaranteed stop loss, I believe some SBs are offering this for a price now. Your actual exposure is far greater than your stop loss. Please be aware that stops on DMA are never guaranteed.
Spread betting companies are out to make a profit. To achieve this their customers on average must be wrong more times than they are right. Bearing in mind that the SBs make their own market (loosely based on an underlying instrument) , do you really believe they wouldn't play 'games' with that market to the detriment of the customer? Have you ever compared an instruments chart live with that of it's SB counterpart? It makes very interesting viewing :idea:
Spread betting companies are out to make a profit. To achieve this their customers on average must be wrong more times than they are right. Bearing in mind that the SBs make their own market (loosely based on an underlying instrument) , do you really believe they wouldn't play 'games' with that market to the detriment of the customer? Have you ever compared an instruments chart live with that of it's SB counterpart? It makes very interesting viewing :idea:
As most clients will lose anyway, SB companies don't need to play games. It might have been true once, but SB markets that have a direct underlying instrument could hardly be be described as loosely based nowadays, unless you make the mistake of comparing an index like the Dow with the SB US30/WS30, or the FTSE with the 'UK100', which are based on the futures, adjusted for fair value.
The SB industry as of today is very clean compared to the overall FX retail industry market making.It happens right across all instruments, extended spikes, not turning at round numbers when the market does etc. It's totally legal too, as it's 'their' market we are trading, that's why they do it. FXCM has manipulated FX data loads of time to their favour.
The SB industry as of today is very clean compared to the overall FX retail industry market making.
You have to look at the overall picture of the FX retail market. I am not talking about Oanda, I am talking about the retail FX market as a whole (market makers).Sorry I don't agree with you. Open an account with Oanda and you will find you get good fills 90%+ of the time, just stay away at news times as the widen the spread, but i scalp successfully with them on a daily basis. I can't comment on any other bucket shop type market maker that spring up all over the place based on the MT4 platform as these usually run the virtual dealer plug in that's designed to make your life harder to win.
You have to look at the overall picture of the FX retail market. I am not talking about Oanda, I am talking about the retail FX market as a whole (market makers).
(1)As most clients will lose anyway, SB companies don't need to play games. It might have been true once, but SB markets that have a direct underlying instrument could hardly be be described as (2)loosely based nowadays, unless you make the mistake of comparing an index like the Dow with the SB US30/WS30, or the FTSE with the 'UK100', (3)which are based on the futures, adjusted for fair value.