Well, when you scalp you simply follow the trend, but it can turn back anytime.
Usually i set my target at 10 points and the stop loss at five.
Obviously if i have a strong trend and i can take far than 10 points i will do it but most of the times it goes lets say in 9 and then it comes back and i close the position as an average at 4-5 points,
so i will never go far than 5 points to make a stop. My success depends on making a lot more sucesful entrances than those that fail.
Someone told me once, your stop loss must be half the way of your profit target, so i am giving you these tip that does not belong to me but has done well for me.
When I occasionally 'scalp' GBPUSD (only) I use an initial stop of around 20 pips at a level where I think the market will not go. This is an 'emergency stop' only in case the market spikes against me. If in a trade and PA appears to be going the wrong way or stalling I get out for a small loss between 3 and 10 pips depending on where the swings are on the 1 min time frame as my reason for entering will have been invalidated. I don't hold on hoping for price to come back. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't IMO you shouldn't be hitting and hoping.
I think this is one of the reasons people who are more used to swing trading look at scalping and think '20 pip stop, 3 pip win, R:R is awful you cannot win' etc etc etc. But you can win becaause your risk is dynamic and reduced agressively once in a trade, not fixed at 20 pips or whatever.
You should NEVER let your losers run to your stop if you can help it. You'll never win that way.
Do u average up and down ( scale ) ?
Do u scalp one pair only ? Which broker if u dont mind ?
Any thoughts on a Dax stop loss?
I don't scalp, but there have been a few points made in this thread that I don't understand and would be interested to hear what the reasoning behind them is. These are not criticisms, I'm just interested in how people approach a totally different style of trading.
Stop Placement
Why would you assign a random number? Is the correct place not where the market tells you that you are wrong, according to your method? So if the logical point was 7 pips away, why place it 5 pips away? Or if it was 3 pips away, why risk 5? You can use the 3 you need and have a larger position size.
Targets
A couple of people have commented on targets, being arbitrary and whatnot. Certainly to me it makes no sense to say that your target is 50 pips or whatever it might be. But does anyone set targets that way? Surely the market sets your target for you?
Good comments , i didnt mean random number i meant what is the average stoploss scalpers use based on their systems ...
When we say scalping we mean short or very short term trading and this will result in a stoploss that averages around certain number , scalpers stoploss will not vary that much in every trade sometimes 5 sometimes 12 , this is a wide range , usually it will be around certain number , i read about Dax scalpers some of them will give room for a few ticks only ( 2 -3 points max ) , the idea in scalping is that u will c your account grow in a daily basis if u r profitable ofcourse , u will use little risk in every trade for example 0.5% for 4 pips in Euro/Usd , this way u can recover your losses streak quickly , 20 pips in euro is quiet achiveable , at the end u need low or very low spreads , commissions , fees , slippage , and a smooth platform , quick reaction , and the most important rule discplane cuz scalping will make u emotinal if u dont trust yourself but if you trust your self and you believe in your abilities u will make it at the end , it is hard but it is great if u can make it .Sorry, "random" wasn't the right word to use without an explanation - I didn't mean to imply that people were just picking numbers out of thin air. I suppose what I was driving at is if you fix on a number such as 5 pips for whatever reasons (that may be perfectly sound in themselves), on any given trade will the stop not be "random" in that situation? In that it doesn't (or at least doesn't necessarily) correspond to where you would judge the trade to have gone againat you, according to your method?
As I say, I have no idea about this kind of trading - it seems totally different to the type that I am attempting to develop - so I'm not criticising anybody's approach. It's just quite interesting to hear the reasoning behind different ways of tackling the markets.
I don't scalp, but there have been a few points made in this thread that I don't understand and would be interested to hear what the reasoning behind them is. These are not criticisms, I'm just interested in how people approach a totally different style of trading.
Stop Placement
Why would you assign a random number? Is the correct place not where the market tells you that you are wrong, according to your method? So if the logical point was 7 pips away, why place it 5 pips away? Or if it was 3 pips away, why risk 5? You can use the 3 you need and have a larger position size.
Targets
A couple of people have commented on targets, being arbitrary and whatnot. Certainly to me it makes no sense to say that your target is 50 pips or whatever it might be. But does anyone set targets that way? Surely the market sets your target for you?
Stop loss is for emergencies only. You shouldn't be relying on it to get you out of a trade that has started to move the wrong way. You don't sit and wait for your stop to hit, you get out anyway. How I trade it ,the stop will only be taken out if I get spiked.
IMO all this, set a stop of 20, set a target of 20, systems type trading is nonesense. Place trade, wait for price to dilly and dally around at -2, -10, -12, -4, -14, -5, waiting, waiting, waiting, hoping, hoping for it to go on side...or the alternative, set, forget...come back...20 pip stop hit ....this is just mechanical trading. EAs don't work so why, if you add the human element and trade the same way would you expect it to work??
It's wrong to apply what is at best, simple binary logic to the markets.
"Using the laws of probability I conclude I need a R:R prior to entering the trade of 1.5:1 given my back tested win loss ratio of x:x, this will give me positive expectancy so over time I will win"....sorry but...b0ll0cXs. You need to have a method of trading (notice I didn't say system) where you take what gains the market offers at that time and where you agressively and fluidly reduce risk depending on market conditions.
Have to say I disagree. A stop is there to control your risk plain and simple. "Emergency"
should never come into it in my opinion.
I trade with a positive reward to risk ratio. I know that i only have to win 50% of the time and I still make money.
The benefit of mehanical trading is that there is no decision making to be had in real time. You know your risk; you know your reward; you know you best outcome and you know your worst.
That is not to say it is the only way to trade but to any discretionary trader who isn't making consitant money I would look at their stop and target levels before anything else...even before looking at their entry reasons. It is the closing of the trade that makes or breaks a trader not the opening.