S&P 500 cash weekly competition for 2014 with PRIZES!

[malaguti]

1860 please

 

[Gaffs1964]

1848 for me please

 

[Pat494]

I see you got the low side covered At along with the perma bear Pete. I will give it a try so 1825

 

[samspade79]

1821

 

[VielGeld]

Before I forget, 1861.

Tough decision. The market plunged on monday, then rallied up, but it's currently stalling anytime it tries to go for 1850, so we may well be in for a correction.

However, the strong uptrend shows no signs of slowing. Until it keels over, I'll keep going long. So 1861 it is, please.

 

[wackypete2]

1824

It's tight at the low end this week

Peter

 

[Atilla]

1824

It's tight at the low end this week

Peter

Follow the leader :whistling

Herd mentality, safety in numbers and all that!

 

[Atilla]

Bulls to bears good luck to you all...

Looks like 40 tick forecast range here between VielGeld @ 1861 and our Sampsade making a bearish entrance @ 1821.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...VubUoyTm9jZGh4Z0tzdVJoZXc&usp=drive_web#gid=0

 

[Gaffs1964]

I think the bears may have this one!

 

[samspade79]

I still think you should do a count of games entered vs points as my system doesn't always give a trigger but when it does....

 

[Pat494]

I still think you should do a count of games entered vs points as my system doesn't always give a trigger but when it does....

I see your point ....but then the winner of the first week has won because he need not play again ? As with Peter.

We could get over that point, I suppose, by having an increasing scale of points to be won per week ??

 

[Atilla]

I see your point ....but then the winner of the first week has won because he need not play again ? As with Peter.

We could get over that point, I suppose, by having an increasing scale of points to be won per week ??

We should amend weight to reflect games played.

As with all systems, difficult to cater for all consideration despite validity. b

 

[Atilla]

Samspade makes a grand entrance taking gold on the podium... :clap:

Wacky and Pat take silver and bronze.


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...VubUoyTm9jZGh4Z0tzdVJoZXc&usp=drive_web#gid=0



.................................Wacky......................................Samspade..................................Pat

Average is on Wacky's tail in a not so close second place.

I'm delighted to say I've pulled my self off the floor. :cheesy:

 

[Pat494]

1827 for me pls

are levitating now Atilla ?

 

[VielGeld]

Congrats to the winners!

Seems like this downturn is in full swing, so time to go short!

1770 for me, please, monsieur Atilla. :cheesy:

 

[Pat494]

Another good reason for having gradually increasing points per week on offer is to give a better chance to the late and slow starters ?

But up to you now At !! ( the joys of management )

:idea:

 

[malaguti]

1840 for me please

 

[Atilla]

Another good reason for having gradually increasing points per week on offer is to give a better chance to the late and slow starters ?

But up to you now At !! ( the joys of management )

:idea:

I don't understand what is being suggested here???

I was thinking we divide points with number of games played which should improve weighted average calculations.

Need more info otherwise?

 

[samspade79]

I see your point ....but then the winner of the first week has won because he need not play again ? As with Peter.

We could get over that point, I suppose, by having an increasing scale of points to be won per week ??

You could just include people who played 25% or more games or something.

 

[Atilla]

You could just include people who played 25% or more games or something.

Still do not understand what is suggested here?

Just include people in what?

More information please...