1, 2 and 3 are in their infancy, there is still a lot to do in the field, but science is actually working on it. It's just that things are a lot more complicated than previously thought. We sort of know the mechanism that makes people fall in love and it will surprise you - but that's another story.
3 is an unfalsifiable issue, along with the second point which is a philosophical issue
I'm glad you recognise we need more science. 
Right, so if science can't explain, then any fanciful crap that comes into people's heads will do? Am I right about that?
Well I'm not sure science lends it self to this kind of fanciful crap. This was pointed out to you before but YOU DON'T GET IT, do you? :cheesy:
What is this? It's like if all we did in maths was work with 2 or 3 dimensions, or we worked with circles all our lives and when we look at the orbits of planets we assume they must follow a circular orbit because that all we "know". Your big, flawed assumption here is to assume that there is a "reason", or wanting to pry into a reason. Why? Why should the NEED for a reason imply the existence of a God?
Because man needs God. As has been pointed out number of times. Because man needs to believe in God. Way before organised main stream religions whether the Aztecs or the Egyptions there is a genuine need in man to know and find out. A quest perhaps?
This isn't me saying it, it's just man in aggregate wanting these answers.
How is it different? Zero is falsifiable. It NEEDS to be there in our counting system if it is to work. You CANNOT have the integers WITHOUT zero. Just as much as you can't weight things without a standardized unit of weight, or length or temperature.
You have no reasoning, you have fanciful feelings thinking that you have reasoning. And it's BS sorry to say.
I have reason alright. Your BS head of yours fails to grasp the essence of faith - whether you agree with it or not. I'm puzzled as to how you can grasp kg, mph and even zero - the absence of everything and reject faith as BS. Your opinion fair enough by me.
I don't give a damn about God, yours or anyone else's - do you see or not see?
Let's be civil as we are both blogging here along with the eyes of the world.
Why do you need to ask such questions? In fact why the f*ck do you need to ask such questions? It's like you have a disease that makes you give a fixed response to anything you don't know - or never will know.
There are no questions that remain. They are your personal questions, probably shared by others, but it was your choice to ask them. They aren't mine, because to me to ask them is absurd.
You've lost the plot. I'm entitled to ask what ever question I like. As this is www anybody is free to engage or dismiss discussions. YOU DON'T GET IT do you?
This is nothing to do with science, it's everything to do with people's perception of value and what things are worth to certain people in whatever context it's based. Why bother even giving this example - it explains nothing. They may call it art, but I call it crap. But what would I know, I'm not one of the idiots willing to fork out over 100K for such a useless item.
Merely to point out science does not explain everything. BS is all around us. :cheesy:
that's your own PERSONAL problem. Nothing to do with science. If the state of science causes people to believe in unobservable pink elephants in tutus dancing in their fridges when they close the door, well I'm afraid there's nothing that science can do about that
You are asking for specific cases. I say so the f*ck what? Yes, there is a field in sociological science that looks into this and it's in its infancy, but we'll just be talking on endlessly about specific cases all the time. And you have the downright audacity to think science has all the answers? WHAT THE F*CK? If science had all the answers to all this, then what's the point of doing research? What's the point of having labs, or open debates? What would the point of it be?
Simply making the point - like you we don't have all the answers. Evolution goes up the shoot in failing to explain it self. If you bring homosexuality into it - in the absence of medical assitance - humans can cease to exist.
There is a very real need to examine and scientifically study these behaviours and explain exactly what is going on here.
Look if you lack the mental intelligence to perservere you are always at liberty to go and play cards or something. Don't know why you are getting all worked up effing and blinding. Obviously you are upset but no need to be.
I agree such nasty individuals are sub-human, but that's a label to attach to these individuals who we know exist because of their actions. As said previously, science is not here to explain God - that's just your misunderstanding.
I was hoping Evolutionist would explain the abuse and murder of ones own children. I've never seen animals eat their own offspring to get more food. Perhaps others but not their own. Why do you always bring God into it?
that is an arrogant statement. Science has NOT told you how to live your life. It might tell you not to eat mercury since it will poison you. It might tell you to be within a certain weight limit for your height or else you might run into physiological complications with blood circulation and metabolism etc. . .
Most scientists are very humble, in fact science is a very humble occupation. They conduct research because they don't know, and see if they can know MORE within the framework of logic, reasoning and evidence.
Your last statement is purely philosophical. . .
