scholfield
Established member
- Messages
- 993
- Likes
- 233
what happened to the original cablemonster?
You only trade to make money - too many traders forget that
what happened to the original cablemonster?
what happened to the original cablemonster?
Dunno, but he has a vendor stall
F, I think in trading one should aim for perfection, every trade
The very best in the business for the past decade or so had 17 monthly losses in 148 months. I don't want to argue about what's possible, because I believe amazing performance is possible, but equally don't be downhearted if the week hasn't turned out well, and don't lose your composure the next week or start taking reckless trades to catchup. Much better to accept that losing days and weeks are part of this business. Accept it and work to improve.
So my stats say 130+ weeks - and 0% in the red - ie 100% of the time in the black
F
great stats Forexmosbros but you do realise that most people on here will think this is not possible. why dont you post a statement for this weeks trades (amounts blanked out). otherwise its a bit like going on a weight training forum and saying you bench 400kg, you get me. Infact I might just do that and see what response I get.
great stats Forexmosbros but you do realise that most people on here will think this is not possible. why dont you post a statement for this weeks trades (amounts blanked out). otherwise its a bit like going on a weight training forum and saying you bench 400kg, you get me. Infact I might just do that and see what response I get.
Hi Son of the CM
i am going to do something better than that
In the new year I will open a couple of $100 accounts with a scalpers broker Exness or Pepperstone - get my 1000 to 1 or 500 to 1 leverage and then try and put 10,000 % increase on the account within 5 working days and 100 trades ;-)
Always love a challenge - problem is if only put a few thousand % on - every one will say - he's no good - he's a rubbish trader lol
Will have to pick the period and the week etc - and then I will have to focus more as well that week ;-))
CM - loved spanking the bucket brokers as well - maybe you can get him to join in ;-)
Regards
F
Good stuff F, looking forward to it, but this is not the FX-mo sho
So back to the questions:
Lower timeframes are noise
So a 5 minute chart is noise, and there's no signal, but a concatenation of 3 of these (15 minute) or 12 of these (hourly chart) will result in a reliable signal.
All you need is a good looking Pinbar, entry on top, stop at bottom
Hmmm.
Hi Son of the CM
i am going to do something better than that
In the new year I will open a couple of $100 accounts with a scalpers broker Exness or Pepperstone - get my 1000 to 1 or 500 to 1 leverage and then try and put 10,000 % increase on the account within 5 working days and 100 trades ;-)
Always love a challenge - problem is if only put a few thousand % on - every one will say - he's no good - he's a rubbish trader lol
Will have to pick the period and the week etc - and then I will have to focus more as well that week ;-))
CM - loved spanking the bucket brokers as well - maybe you can get him to join in ;-)
Regards
F
The second common belief I would like to question is:
The trend is your friend
Well is it? Quite a strong statement to make, especially when we have to define trend. And your definition is probably different to mine and different to the one who invented the phrase. But even once you take your specific definition, is it better or worse to trade with the trend? Have you checked or assumed it's true?
Is the trend your friend on all timeframes, on all instruments? Is it ever a good idea to trade against it?
All thoughts welcome on this or the previous post, and indeed any other common beliefs that you think are worth questioning.
An interesting view F.
I don't share it regarding either Tudor-Jones or Livermore. I think plenty of traders have said the same thing, Rotter (the flipper) was another who said he couldn't go against the trend for long either. There are others. I also remember reading somewhere an interview in which a wizard explained that he and two others had a plan to manipulate a particular market. He later explained that two of them double-crossed the third and wiped his account. So I'm not convinced they are all protecting the industry or eachother.
As for Livermore, that is a tragic tale, he married the wrong woman and suffered from depression. For a long time I didn't see much in that book. Nowadays I couldn't disagree with you more about its relevance to today's trading.
But your statement about HFT gives me another thing we should question:
Humans can't compete with computers in trading (or indeed games of strategy)
There was a recent BBC article concerning chess and how the machines had won the war and the best human wouldn't even stand a chance now. It took decades for the computer to outplay the grandmasters, but by brute force it was done. What interested me more though was that the article mentioned another game, a variation of chess that was invented a few years ago. They have tournaments, and in this game humans are still the winners and the machines are nowhere near the standard required to win (yet), even after years. Of course they will dominate that game too eventually, but the key point is that when the rules of the game change, or the nature of the game, computers cannot adapt nearly as quickly as humans.
In trading sometimes the rules change, the regulation, the volatility, the participants and winning strategies, new products and markets are created etc. So there's still opportunity for humans if you can adapt to this, and imo always will be.
For some. For others it's more like, snakes and ladders.