erierambler said:Exactly, the people that take responsibility for themselves , learn to think for themselves.
erie
Roberto said:How is it now being enforced that owners of private forums do not have free rein to limit and edit what other members post without good reason? I'd love to be wrong about this, but if you'll excuse my saying so, it looks very much as if that's exactly what they have free rein to do; and indeed that when they do it, you are (understandably) unaware of what posts have been deleted and therefore (naturally) unable to comment.
You can see why I'm confused?
Please can you comment on my confusion, at least, even if not on my deleted posts?
Love it - a real gem.dod said:All the best things that have happened in my life have been the result of wandering through the world with my eyes and ears open and my mouth shut. Walking past firmly closed doors always makes me wonder if I might be missing something.Dod
Bigbusiness, it is not fair of you to say that I wind people up. You ought to look carefully at the record and you will see how much nonsense I have put up with on these boards. It is not that people do not like criticism as you put it, it is that people do not like being told the blunt truth, whith the gloves taken off, as there is too much nonsense bandied about this topic for my liking.Bigbusiness said:I thought the "No Indicators" thread was fantastic before Socrates started posting on it. He has an ability to wind people up and unfortunately he doesn't seem to be capable of starting his own thread. "The Journey from the Basement" thread started in another thread and was moved by a moderator. I remember a few times suggesting he should start his own thread or perhaps have a private forum. I think there are several people who no longer post here because they didn't like the criticism of Socrates but there also seem to be several who didn't like being banned when they had a legitimate disagreement with something he was saying.
.FetteredChinos said:if each and every question and point was debated to a satisfactory conclusion, then we wouldnt have a problem. unfortunately, we have problems with those members who assume an air of superiority, whether justified or not:-
i have been doing this xxx of years. i have honed my methods to pinpoint turning points with unerring accuracy. you will do well to listen to me, young upstart.
SOCRATES said:I am not confused or uninformed or seaching for a holy grail like the majority who keep on asking silly questions again and again. I am the exact opposite of all this, which I now realise is rare. I am totally focused, properly informed and I do not need to ask any questions of any of you. I am able to deliver the answers, the correct answers, blunt and to the point, as a consequence of my experience, which is considerable.
And I agree, but I would be even more strict than you and make it totally closed and not available for anyone to read that is not a member. Membership strictly by invitation only,Trader333 said:Making it "Read Only" will not prevent any of the abuse that was being complained about because much of it was done by email and private message to specific people.
In my view membership should be by request only and see how that progresses.
Paul
SOCRATES said:Bigbusiness, it is not fair of you to say that I wind people up. You ought to look carefully at the record and you will see how much nonsense I have put up with on these boards.
commanderco said:Can someone kindly point me in the direction of "NO INDICATORS" thread please
I do not seem to be able to track it down.
Muchas gracias
Yes, punishment indeed. The punishment is that the really knowledgeable contributors to the thread have left T2W or stopped posting and now occupy another dimension not accessible to any of you, thus depriving the membership of incisive, informed, interesting professional comment.FetteredChinos said:you really are a glutton for punishment
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/showthread.php?t=7751&highlight=indicators