[PORTFOLIO] Darwinia Investment by LongVision

[LongVision]

DarwinIA portfolio result with 3x leverage. 02 months are short period to judge the success of this live portfolio but I like the simplicity of rule for darwin selection.

 

[LongVision]

Current allocation top gainer-SYO, RAT, THA
Current allocation top loser-BAX, FVG, NVL

 

[IlIlIlIlI]

DarwinIA portfolio result with 3x leverage. 02 months are short period to judge the success of this live portfolio but I like the simplicity of rule for darwin selection.View attachment 305139

Great result for this difficult month!

 

[LongVision]

DarwinIA portfolio result after 3.5 months

 

[LongVision]

Top Gainer-BMC, SUG, THA
Top Loser-BAX, FVG, MUF

Max DD :- -4.1%

 

[LongVision]

DarwinIA portfolio update

 

[LongVision]

The portfolio shows a current risk of $100.83 so for the invested amount of $4000 current portfolio VaR should be 2.52%.
If the darwins risk manager calculation for risk is accurate then MaxDD will most likely be <5%-10%.

 

[CavaliereVerde]

The portfolio shows a current risk of $100.83 so for the invested amount of $4000 current portfolio VaR should be 2.52%.

100 has to be comparet to equity not to amount.
VaR is already calculated as "equity at risk" that in your case is 7.18%, consistent for a leveraged portfolio of 20 darwins.

 

[LongVision]

DarwinIA portfolio update after 05 months

 

[LongVision]

Portfolio balancing is due next month for this portfolio.

Top Gainer-BMC, SYO, DKM
Top Loser-MUF, FVG, BAX

 

[LongVision]

DarwinIA portfolio update after 06 months

 

[LongVision]

Time to rebalance the portfolio after 06 months.

 

[LongVision]

Here is the result for the 01-year lookback DarwinIA.
BOT, OLP, and SKN are out due to Cp<1.5

Sl. No	DARWIN	01 Year allocation	All time allocation	Cp
1​	BAX	6​	14​	5.7​
2​	BFS	6​	13​	4.8​
3​	BMC	6​	19​	6.8​
4​	BOT	5​	14​	0.8​
5​	DKM	6​	14​	2.4​
6​	ERQ	6​	24​	1.9​
7​	FVG	5​	12​	6.4​
8​	GXO	5​	11​	5.2​
9​	JTL	7​	14​	5.3​
10​	MUF	7​	14​	3.7​
11​	NLM	6​	11​	1.7​
12​	NSC	5​	17​	7.1​
13​	OLP	6​	12​	1.4​
14​	OOS	6​	11​	5.1​
15​	PUL	9​	19​	2​
16​	SKN	6​	13​	0.7​
17​	SUG	6​	14​	3.5​
18​	TVS	6​	11​	6​
19​	TXR	7​	11​	1.5​
20​	USI	7​	13​	10​
21​	UYZ	6​	26​	4.7​
22​	VRT	5​	20​	4.4​
23​	YFC	8​	12​	5.2​

 

[LongVision]

New allocation on Jan-22

Sell-BOT, KGL, NVL, RAT, SKN, SYO, THA, ZVQ
Buy-GXO, JTL, NLM, OOS, TVS, TXR, USI, YFC

 

[LongVision]

Three lesser-known darwins GXO, FVG and NLM in DarwinIA portfolio.

 

[morehastelessspeed]

Just to show how aligned DarwinIA are with the interests of investors:

Winner of DarwinIA December 2021: incurs in a Drawdawn that takes away the profits of 6 months and ends up winning the competition through a recovery that lasted precisely December. The return to drawdown for those 6 months is about 1:1 ...

 

[LongVision]

Winner of DarwinIA december 2021: incurs in a Drawdawn that takes away the profits of 6 months and ends up winning the competition through a recovery that lasted precisely december. The return to drawdown for those 6 months is about 1:1

This is true that many darwinIA allocations occur during recovery.

But my darwinIA portfolio is not for a single month Darwinia allocation, this darwinIA portfolio is about long-term darwinIA performers. This is a rule-based investment portfolio without any bias.
This experiment is only 06 months old and I need at least 03 years of data for any conclusion. Let's see how this investment journey will end.

 

[morehastelessspeed]

Please don't get me wrong. The winner of December is to be congratulated for the recovery. I used to follow him even before his Darwin started, and I don't think there's anything wrong with him.

I also think your work is sound, and in fact I have been and I am still invested in your own Darwin. Keep up the good work!

All I'm saying now is that, for a skilled enough trader, it might be more profitable to keep winning DarwinIA than to manage the Darwin for those of us on the investor side of the Darwinex platform. And these two objectives are not necessarily aligned.

 

[trilobite]

All I'm saying now is that, for a skilled enough trader, it might be more profitable to keep winning DarwinIA than to manage the Darwin for those of us on the investor side of the Darwinex platform. And these two objectives are not necessarily aligned.

Surely if a trader keeps winning Darwinia they must be consistently profitable, which is good for investors.

 

[CavaliereVerde]

I don'tthink there are traders intentionally generating ups and downs to win allocations.
Winning the allocation does not make a real difference, turning it to earnings makes it.