So again you accuse me of things I have never done. Where have I suggested anyone can get involved in anything at all, much less in complicated matters? I don't care what anyone gets in involved in and so did not mention anything of the kind in my post.SOCRATES said:Listen....all of it is obvious...it cannot be more obvious than it is. I am not sidestepping anythng. I am just getting on with my business. You seem to think anyone can get involved in complex matters without having a solid grounding and a methodology to underpin it. So what do you expect ? I do not understand what you want. It is very simple. If you know how to trade you know how to trade and if you don't you don't. And some of us are better than others and some of us are stars and some are not and some are dunces who will never make it. Now what exactly do you expect me to do about it. Do you expect me to swap my proficiency for inefficiency or what exactly is it you expect ? I am doing what I set out to do. That's all.
Of course some will be better than others at trading, that has never been in debate. It is obvious you trot out that tiresome line because you can not rationally and logically debate your point. Every time you attempt to do so you end up reasoning for the opposite to your hypothesis. So instead you take to waffling on about things other than the debate at hand, or claim you are not going to enter into any debate when you clearly do if you think it suits your purpose to do so. This is known as "sidestepping".
As for what I want, especially from you, nothing at all. I am merely debating an issue that you yourself raised. As you have clearly and repeatedly admitted I am right then I guess the debate can end.
Cheers,
PKFFW