SOCRATES
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,966
- Likes
- 136
Why are you asking so many questions ? This is not a classroom.linesniffer said:What is the most popular option trade, the write or the buy?
Do you want to be shot as well ?
Why are you asking so many questions ? This is not a classroom.linesniffer said:What is the most popular option trade, the write or the buy?
SOCRATES said:I know this lot here are really desperate...but I did not include you with them...I am shocked..
Now this is obvious stupidity now...it really is...Profitaker said:It is exaclty equal, evidently, because for every option seller there must be.....a buyer.
I never fail Zupcon, my accuracy is deadly...look what happened to DC 2000 by trying to be clever with me and attempting to contradict to show off.... ..ooops...Ha Ha Ha.zupcon said:Im surprised he didnt at least ask for more details regarding the weapon, and the accuracy of your aim
regards
zupcon
2 Bizzy looking at all kind of weapon catalogszupcon said:Im surprised he didnt at least ask for more details regarding the weapon, and the accuracy of your aim
regards
zupcon
superfly said:2 Bizzy looking at all kind of weapon catalogs
prepared for the unexpected:idea:zupcon said:I hadnt thought of that possibility, that might have been a very asute move
Now wot ? Wot do you want now ? Lessons ? No !linesniffer said:Look, i was being inquisitive, maybe too much.
The last thing i need right now is for Socs to start waving his long prodder at me.
now I know that you really do love usSOCRATES said:and explain everything to you as you all deserve........in his own inimitable style...
SOCRATES said:And...not to rub it in....but because it is a fact...every single position is profitable and has been profitable.....may this please my fans and infuriate my detractors, I Thank You.:cheesy:
SOCRATES said:And...not to rub it in....but because it is a fact...every single position is profitable and has been profitable.....may this please my fans and infuriate my detractors, I Thank You.:cheesy:
Firstly, thankyou for directly admitting I am correct. I commend you on this as the first step to improving oneself is admitting there is a problem. You have finally admitted there is a problem with your logic on this thread, now you can commence improving your logic, so congratulations.SOCRATES said:The thing is.....in a way you are right.....the question is that "how" everything is known in advance is the question that baffles everybody who is not a member of the Elite 34S Club or The Star Chamber or its ancillary facility, the Platinum Lounge, in which matters which emanate from The Star Chamber are presented for discussion by members.
Then when everything is known in advance all is a doddle. It makes trading easier.
It seems to me that what you are really after.......... is to get to know how to futurologise. I am sorry that knowledge is held as restricted. What I can tell you is that at whatever level of proficiency the trader is, an ability to suss the future is paramount to success.
If you are not going to address the point of my post directly, why quote me in the first place? Such a long winded reply to sidestep the issue I raised when all you needed to say was something akin to "well you are right", which, incidentally, is exactly what you did write. So everything after that is once again smoke and mirrors to attempt to camouflage the fact that your premise for this thread is flawed.SOCRATES said:The consistency or lack of it is what distinguishes the master trader from the mere aspirant.
Then comensurate with the level of proficiency in this regard, comensurate is the ability of the trader to do the exact opposite of what everyone thinks he ought to be doing.
This is why I have often explained one must disregard the majority popular opinion, because it is nearly always wrong.
Why is that ? It is due in large measure to the collective inability of the public to be able to futurologise properly.
Then as a consequence of this inability the wrong opinions are held, the wrong statements are made, the wrong thinking is pursued, the wrong decisions are taken and the wrong outcomes are the result.
It therefore implies, that for anyone undertaking any operation in the markets which are fraught with uncertainty and risk , the first requirement must be for them to understand what it is they are in, in the first instance, and then, as a consequence of total familiarity with the environement in which they find themselves, then everything falls into place, including success in trading in arenas that appear suicidal to everyone else.
In short what I am saying is you have to be an efficient trader first before you can venture to do anything properly. Common sense innit ? You can flick a coin and get it right but it helps if you know something before you flick it.
Listen....all of it is obvious...it cannot be more obvious than it is. I am not sidestepping anythng. I am just getting on with my business. You seem to think anyone can get involved in complex matters without having a solid grounding and a methodology to underpin it. So what do you expect ? I do not understand what you want. It is very simple. If you know how to trade you know how to trade and if you don't you don't. And some of us are better than others and some of us are stars and some are not and some are dunces who will never make it. Now what exactly do you expect me to do about it. Do you expect me to swap my proficiency for inefficiency or what exactly is it you expect ? I am doing what I set out to do. That's all.PKFFW said:Firstly, thankyou for directly admitting I am correct. I commend you on this as the first step to improving oneself is admitting there is a problem. You have finally admitted there is a problem with your logic on this thread, now you can commence improving your logic, so congratulations.
Secondly, you always seem to accuse me of wanting you to reveal your methods or strategies. Never have I asked this of you and you know it. You always seem to throw this accusation out when you can not refute what I am have posted. Perhaps you should think about this and nut out the reasons why you feel compelled to repeatedly accuse me of something I have never done.
If you are not going to address the point of my post directly, why quote me in the first place? Such a long winded reply to sidestep the issue I raised when all you needed to say was something akin to "well you are right", which, incidentally, is exactly what you did write. So everything after that is once again smoke and mirrors to attempt to camouflage the fact that your premise for this thread is flawed.
Have you ever played rugby? You show admirable sidestepping skills that I'm sure many clubs would be interested in. Unfortunately for you I am equally well versed in snaring those elusive backs.
Cheers,
PKFFW
..Appreciated, Thanks. Pass it on...:cheesy:mr.marcus said:......a message from the stalls
I am pleased you like it. My compliments to all the crew as well...:cheesy:sandpiper said:Well done sir. A superb illustration of true trading mastery.