You have an interesting philosopy on life, I'm sure many Nazis believed unquestionably, as do many fundimentalists. There is nothing wrong with a questioning mind, indeed it will be a much more enlightened one than the one that does not. Of course the method of questioning is a whole other issue.If Socrates professes that writers have the edge then I believe him, unquestionably, and I don't need to know anything about Options trading
roguetrader said:You have an interesting philosopy on life, I'm sure many Nazis believed unquestionably, as do many fundimentalists. There is nothing wrong with a questioning mind, indeed it will be a much more enlightened one than the one that does not. Of course the method of questioning is a whole other issue.
new_trader said:1) I have no reason to think Socrates is a liar
2) I have every reason to believe Socrates knows a great deal about options trading
3) I have every reason to believe Socrates is an Elite Trader with an edge.
I have come to the above conclusions based on what I have witnessed in this and other threads.
If Socrates professes that writers have the edge then I believe him, unquestionably, and I don't need to know anything about Options trading nor does he require providing me with "proof". I take what he says on face value and with faith. In the same way that I (and I suspect many people here) don't need to see a pilots credentials, or the Boeing aircraft blueprints and aerodynamic calculations before boarding a flight.
SOCRATES said:It goes deeper than that. Being able to call the market direction is not enough of itself, it is a help but it is not everything.
It is having a complete understanding on a holistic basis of the scenario as a whole rather than aspects of it that makes the difference.
barjon said:socrates
Yes, I go along with that. However, on that very same basis, is it not difficult to isolate one potential edge from another in the overall scene? I suppose one way would be to assume that all else is without edge and equal. On that basis, would it be right to say that your position is that writers have the edge over buyers all other things being equal?
jon
What a quaint world you live in.new_trader said:I remember reading somewhere that if someone makes a refernce to Nazis during a debate in forum then they have lost the debate
Already covered......new_trader said:There is a BIG difference between inqusitive questions, accusations and demands for secrets to be revealed.
roguetrader said:Of course the method of questioning is a whole other issue.
I have no contempt for Socrates, or anyone else on these boards for that matter. My point was that if indeed you are a "new trader" you will encounter a great deal both written and spoken in an authorative manner, you cannot accept it all at face value, you should question all of it. Of course how you present your questions may go a long way to determine what sort of answer you get.new_trader said:I have no intention of trading options based on Socrates' words. I simply can't undersatand why he is the target of such scorn and contempt..
SOCRATES said:I amassed a huge collection of works and everntualy it became surplus to my needs......I got fed up with having to cart around every time I moved house.......I decided... to include them in a huge bonfire at the weekend, and so the whole lot went up in smoke. It took five hours to burn the lot.
If you don't mind, will you please post this on another thread,CYOF said:I am sorry to say, as it will disappoint a lot of my Irish colleagues, but MY OPINION is that:
Murphy's Law Is Flawed
http://www.murphys-laws.com/
If you like I will show you how it is flawed, but only if Socrates agrees to it to be posted on his thread - if not, I will post on another thread, as there is enough side tracking as it is here.
I will not debate it, nor ague it, nor tit for tat it, I will show how a simple extract from a writing, many years ago, shows how everything that happens in the world is not Fixed - and as Murphy said, "if it can happen, it will happen", is not true for all things.
It is MY OPINION - you can of course draw your own, for it is a democratic society we live in.
Yes exactly and what happens is that when fundamental truths are laid out in front of you lot, somehow.... ...you manage to mess up your own reasoning and come up with the most incrdible and arcane conclusions.roguetrader said:What a quaint world you live in.
Already covered......
##########################################################################
I have no contempt for Socrates, or anyone else on these boards for that matter. My point was that if indeed you are a "new trader" you will encounter a great deal both written and spoken in an authorative manner, you cannot accept it all at face value, you should question all of it. Of course how you present your questions may go a long way to determine what sort of answer you get.
###########################################################################
Since this has nothing to do with the thread I will desist from further comment.
Those are not books, they are Reichbanknotes of 1000 Marks denomination.Spam Man said:If history has taught us anything it is that the most reasonable way to deal with an excess of books is to bung the whole lot on a ruddy big fire.
And then invade Poland.
SOCRATES said:Here goes...
Trade number 15. ~ ( four more trades left to complete the series )
Writtten 3 X FTSE 100 INDEX puts May 6225 @ 110 = £3300 = Thank You.
Just written this minute ~look at this timestamp and look on your screen right now.
SOCRATES said:If you don't mind, will you please post this on another thread,
The Little Circle would probably be just fine. Thanks, CYOF.
Don't you start as well/CYOF said:
SOCRATES said:I would hazard a thought in your case, you are not in any condition to burn either books or banknotes anyway.
SOCRATES said:Don't you start as well/
All of them are very clear.
All of them are displayed in real time with a timestamp and a corresponding live entry on screen.
For the goodness sake. Really really hard work this is becoming.
I wish I had never started this.