I concur
I am very new to trading and the range of indicators on charts, so may be missing the point here - but is it connected to the fact that MACD and SAR are based on what has already happened, and so can never be wholly reliable guides to what is about to happen?
I am fairly new to trading and have meddled a little with this system using mainly 1 minute charts, but looking at 5 minutes to gauge the trend. Often, even on 1 min. chart, by the time 3 MACD and SAR indicators have lined up together in a new direction, a good proportion of an initial move has already passed. This is not surprising if the MACD is some sort of indicator of (past) momentum.
Also if one looks at charts on different time-scales, then often you get different positions of MACD and SAR in the different time-frames.
Perhaps the point of the system is not that following it guarantees a profitable trade - more that trading when theses signals do not line up may be more likely to result in a loss.
And of course one is trading solely on technicals here - and the market responds to other factors too. I have been following Tony Juste's weblog for comments on forex at fxstreet.com - very highly recommended, have not checked this forum's rules to see if I can post URLs here so I won't. Interesting to see a guy who really knows his stuff on the technicals occasionally bemused or irritated when the market, e.g. GBP/USD sometimes over the past 2 weeks, is not doing what it is supposed to technically!
None of this is a criticism of the system, just an observation. Thanks to those who have publicised the system for us all.
hi,
I concur with what you say on all counts.
I don't know of any indicators that can predict future price moves with any reliability.
No guarantees ever. Just stacking up the probabilities in ones favour of a successful outcome. One is not looking for perfection, just making the most of the system and trying to identify higher probability trades.
I think being able to spot when not to take signals from this system is most important. Thats probably why I was so interested when the MACDH/PSAR gave off very dodgy signals. From what i've read they are notoriously bad in ranging market conditions. Also, the lower timeframes, especially 1m, give off so much noise.
You are correct that most of the time the signals from this very simple system do not line up on different time frames. However!! I have one for you today! It lined up almost perfectly on 1m, 2m, 3m and 15m! (on the FTSE future Capital Spreads) I didn't take the trade unfortunately because I didn't notice this until afterwards. It happened at 10:17am on the 1m, 10:18 on 2m, 10:18 on 3m, and 10:15 (1st red bar) on 15m.
I didn't place my first trade until 11:14 on the 1m. It seemed high probability because shorting seemed to be with the flow of trend today. Price was below moving averages heading down on higher timeframes, the MACD signal line was below 0 and heading down. This was no guarantee which is why i place the small stop loss. It was just a trade that, to me, in my limited experience, seemed to have good probabilities of success. I know that with every trade anything can happen. But it gave me +14.70 profit. I had to wait over 3 hours to get it. But i got it. And now I can close shop for the day!
I concur on you final point, thanks to ceydababy for sharing this system with us. Its changed my daytrading experience for the better. A simple system that i'm managing okay with so far.
happy trading,
Scott