Yamato
Legendary member
- Messages
- 9,840
- Likes
- 246
I traded my usual CME futures, the CL (it's becoming a CME future) and the GBP. By the way...
NEW METHOD OF DISCRETIONARY TRAVIS TRADING: with the "STOPLOSS"
After a few months, I have realized that no matter how many disasters I get myself into, I am very very close to discretionary profitability, after only 12 years of trading. I decided that I won't quit it after all I've been saying against it. Yes, even with those disasters that make me lose 2000 dollars, I then make it all up, little by little. I am almost at breakeven point. I don't see why I shouldn't try to make profitability.
The big novelty will be the "stoploss", a concept I've invented just a few minutes ago. I will have to know how much I will lose at the most from every given trade I plan to enter, and I will have to enter that "stoploss" (from "stop" and "loss") in advance. Yes, because my problem is not getting trades right. I am right on most of my market calls. The problem is that 20% or less of mistakes that cause me losses of 2000 or more dollars. Stoplosses do not have to be fixed. I can even say in advance that I am willing to accept a loss of 1000 dollars. The point is that I just have to be totally ready for that loss, so that I won't risk a bigger loss, by letting it run further for fear of losing, of seeing that -1000 materialize.
I can do it. I am very close to being profitable. My specialty are those trades where I go long on an oversold market, at about this time. I rarely am wrong on those. As I said about 20% of the time. Oh, and on the GBP, since the contract is small, I can even double up on losers (only many points lower).
What's been important in making me decide to try discretionary trading in an official and guilt-free way is that I realized that with 10k my automated systems aren't going to go anywhere and I need to help them reach 20k at least. I've been stuck at 10k for months and months.
ONE INVENTION IS NOT ENOUGH: I AM INVENTING THE "TRAILING STOP"
I am going to use this, the "trailing stop". It will both function as a way to keep my losses from being too big, and my wins from being too short, which is my tendency. Also, I am always looking for the beginning of a new trend, so there's no point in taking profits early, since I am looking for big profits and not small. We'll see how that goes. Today it made me lose some on the CL only because the trailing wasn't wide enough. New method for me then, it's all clear now: TRAILING STOP. In my quest to reach a capital of 20k.
I DON'T HAVE TO LOSE 2000 TO REALIZE I WAS WRONG
After all, the whole thing revolves around this concept: I get a majority of trades right, but the small minority that I get wrong make me lose 2000 apiece. Well, I don't have to lose that much to realize I was wrong, and if I can get that realization from just a loss of 300, then I'm set and I can win. But most of all: my plan comes first. I have to know ahead if I am planning to exit at all in case of loss, or if I'll stick to my trade no matter what, and if it's worth it to lose 2000 in case I am wrong. Planning ahead, that's all I need to do, and evaluating whether, with such plan, it makes sense to enter. If I can keep that loss down to 300, even in case I don't exit at all, then my discretionary trading will finally be profitable.
NEW METHOD OF DISCRETIONARY TRAVIS TRADING: with the "STOPLOSS"
After a few months, I have realized that no matter how many disasters I get myself into, I am very very close to discretionary profitability, after only 12 years of trading. I decided that I won't quit it after all I've been saying against it. Yes, even with those disasters that make me lose 2000 dollars, I then make it all up, little by little. I am almost at breakeven point. I don't see why I shouldn't try to make profitability.
The big novelty will be the "stoploss", a concept I've invented just a few minutes ago. I will have to know how much I will lose at the most from every given trade I plan to enter, and I will have to enter that "stoploss" (from "stop" and "loss") in advance. Yes, because my problem is not getting trades right. I am right on most of my market calls. The problem is that 20% or less of mistakes that cause me losses of 2000 or more dollars. Stoplosses do not have to be fixed. I can even say in advance that I am willing to accept a loss of 1000 dollars. The point is that I just have to be totally ready for that loss, so that I won't risk a bigger loss, by letting it run further for fear of losing, of seeing that -1000 materialize.
I can do it. I am very close to being profitable. My specialty are those trades where I go long on an oversold market, at about this time. I rarely am wrong on those. As I said about 20% of the time. Oh, and on the GBP, since the contract is small, I can even double up on losers (only many points lower).
What's been important in making me decide to try discretionary trading in an official and guilt-free way is that I realized that with 10k my automated systems aren't going to go anywhere and I need to help them reach 20k at least. I've been stuck at 10k for months and months.
ONE INVENTION IS NOT ENOUGH: I AM INVENTING THE "TRAILING STOP"
I am going to use this, the "trailing stop". It will both function as a way to keep my losses from being too big, and my wins from being too short, which is my tendency. Also, I am always looking for the beginning of a new trend, so there's no point in taking profits early, since I am looking for big profits and not small. We'll see how that goes. Today it made me lose some on the CL only because the trailing wasn't wide enough. New method for me then, it's all clear now: TRAILING STOP. In my quest to reach a capital of 20k.
I DON'T HAVE TO LOSE 2000 TO REALIZE I WAS WRONG
After all, the whole thing revolves around this concept: I get a majority of trades right, but the small minority that I get wrong make me lose 2000 apiece. Well, I don't have to lose that much to realize I was wrong, and if I can get that realization from just a loss of 300, then I'm set and I can win. But most of all: my plan comes first. I have to know ahead if I am planning to exit at all in case of loss, or if I'll stick to my trade no matter what, and if it's worth it to lose 2000 in case I am wrong. Planning ahead, that's all I need to do, and evaluating whether, with such plan, it makes sense to enter. If I can keep that loss down to 300, even in case I don't exit at all, then my discretionary trading will finally be profitable.
Last edited: