Yes, Atilla, but this latest post of yours is New News that we did not know before and most of us did not believe him because of association.
I admt that I have been, severely, contaminated by what is going on, here, in Spain.
Artur Mas was associated with the Pujols. Guilty? We can't even be sure of what.
The king's sister is on trial and now his aunt is a Panama Name. Is the king guilty?
The Leader of Spain's government and most of the others have lost credibilty because of Barcenas's corruption, etc. Are they guilty.?
That makes me a bit cynical about Dave Cameron. Yet, there was no evedence at the time.
Hi Split,
Yes agree and I believed Cameron too when he on Tuesday morning adamantly said "I have no shares, no offshore trusts, no offshore funds, nothing like that. And, so that, I think, is a very clear description."
Tuesday PM - "To be clear, the Prime Minister, his wife and their children do not benefit from any offshore funds."
Wednesday - A spokesperson for Downing Street offered a further clarification and said: "There are no offshore funds/trusts which the Prime Minister, Mrs Cameron or their children will benefit from in future."
Thursday evening - The Prime Minister admits he profited from shares held in an offshore fund set up by his late father but insisted it was "subject to all the UK taxes in the normal ways".
My personal view is that I believe this to be a government policy issue.
The only way to tackle this problem is by applying the law of the land. Declaration of Earnings is a legal requirement. So if bodies have misled HMRC then they should be pursued. Same as benefit fraudsters or other UK tax payers.
To all those people who mouth off British Sovereignty should adhere to laws of Parliament. Instead we have such people decide to take their money and them selves to other places whilst voting otherwise. Heard expats in Spain wanting to vote in for Brexin but complaining they are denied the vote.
It's becoming a' a hotch potch mess of a democracy.
I think we should also all start using off-shore tax efficcient vehicles if they are legal then the Government will be forced into making policy changes.
One for all and all for one as the musketeers motto goes.
Problem is when some pigs think them selves more equal than others.