trader333 & tar are entirely correct.
Mr Fox is saying that his risk is equivalent to 0.4% of a/c per pip, and that he's risking 2%/trade (ie 5 pip SL) on cable and making circa 20%/day (LOL).
Mathematically we can also work out that Mr Fox has returns of circa 100%/wk or 5000%pa. Assuming he invested just £10k into his account, his account growth is as follows:
Yr1 £0.5 million
Yr2 £25 million
Yr3 £1.25 billion
Yr4 £62.5 billion
Yr5 £3 trillion 125 billion and some pennies
Also his risk of ruin is 100%, but I won't bore you with that, because no one loses on t2w. Oh, and HMRC will be visiting this thread, because by taxing the above, the entire UK national debt can be paid off, with plenty to spare. Jesus wept...
Actually F the above isn't compounding - it's linear growth !
And if he traded a 10-lot, (without compounding) his position sizing would mean he'd only need a £25k account (which is modest for a pro trader). At which point he'd be making £5k/day, or £25k/wk, or £1.2m pa. :whistling
FoMo,. . .Oh and what 90% think spreadbetting is tax free for all and sundry - even if you are full time and paying no other form of tax - so the HMRC cannot have Mr Fox's millions - ( but I know otherwise and I am sure you do )
FoMo,
It's usual for someone who claims to 'know' something to back up their assertion with evidence and facts. That you have failed so lamentably to provide either suggests to me that you don't 'know' half as much as you think you do or that you'd have us all believe!
Have the HMRC taken a spredbettor to court of this matter and won a case ? If not then there's an argument against it.
Humble apologies guru FoMo.When you get to my age in life - and gone through the experiences I have - then you will understand more about things not clearly being "black or white". . .
Humble apologies guru FoMo.
At 55, I am still young compared to you great master, and I am very naïve, immature and know so little of this world. Thank you for bestowing such great teachings upon me, so that one day, I might be as wise and as all knowing as you.
What's so hard to understand about the fact that anyone who thinks they're consistently making 20% per day is deluded?
As tar said, it's simple maths.
However, my other question is this.. You made 73 pips, but that you did over 10 trades. So could it not be expressed that you risked 20% (each trade a 2% risk) of your capital to make 29% ?
If a 29% increase in account size = 73 pips then to me the total account cannot be larger than the equivalent of 250 pips,
ie 73/29 x 100 = 250
So that would mean 1 pip in percent = 1/250 x100 = 0.4%
Or have I misunderstood something ?
Are you serious? Because a few people have written multiple posts, you believe that somehow invalidates basic maths and common sense?
Tell you what, let's make this easy. If some retail posters think they are consistently making 20%/day, how about we some evidence. I won't hold my breath.
No, don't make it easy. I've had enough of easy maths for this morning, thanks very much. It seems to be beyond people's capacity, on this thread, to make anything easy.
All I want to know is what Mr Fox's tactics are. My profit and porcentages, I am quite capable of working out for myself.
These porcentages you talk about, are they related to percentages in any way?
Don't you start!