There is no reference to Jack Crooks in this litigation. On what basis do you say Crooks is "part of Weiss Group"? Weiss may be marketing the service but that doesn't mean the service is dishonest. Virtually all investment advisory services are over hyped by the marketers, to be sure. Any new service should be paper traded only until you are satisfied that it gives you an edge on the market. There is no "Holy Grail" in trading - any service or system will have losing trades and drawdowns, which is why risk management is vital to your financial health. A good trader takes responsibility for his trades, a poor trader blames his tools.
The account is $750,000 i have all the trades logged on all the weiss subscriptions and they are at 87.5% failure.
All the trades were supposed to be hedged with inverse etfs but these failed plus i traded option on banks, companies etc but wih a fixation on puts,they never saw the rallies. As for blaming my tools whats the point of subscribing and not taking their advice.if you look at their adverts they are still misleading on their claims so as to suck in novice traders especially in a crisis .
jack Crooks is the chief option stategist for weiss their advertising IS dishonest, take a look i have been at the sharp end of it subscibing to 5 different alerts so as to cover my risk, they have lost me money quicker than any bank failure or stock crash.
Iam sorry you think iam whinging over my losses but the advice as been shockingly bad
tossing a coin would have been better.
If i had have gone the exact opposite on ALL the trades i would be in profit by $150,000 on the amounts that I yes me decided to trade.
Its obvious from your response that you are a seasoned trader but what about the novice who cant take the hits trade after trade, please look at the slick advertising its doom and gloom then we can save you just subscibe NOW at $1500.000 and $2500.000work this out last week yet another subscription 50,000 joined the tele cast to be saved, lets say only 5,000 joined at $1500 yes $7,500,000 thats just the last one they have at least 6.
when an alert arrives all that is changed in the different subscriptions is the name of the company they want you to trade, are you telling me the EXACT same fundementals are the same for a timber company and a rail company and a bank?
As it states in the securities case all suscibers back to 006 would have lost money.
Obviously you have not traded with Jack Crooks lately through Weiss.
ALL losing!