What are the most common market analysis methods, the most used and the most effective ?
What are the most common market analysis methods, the most used and the most effective ?
most common .................. buy hi sell lo (so the Scriptures may be fulfilled)
most used .................. buy hi sell lo
most effective .................. buy lo sell hi
What are the most common market analysis methods, the most used and the most effective ?
99.999999% of everything you read on trading is Bullshit....
join the rest of us hunting that 0.000001% Holy grail
Isn't all analysis that doesn't involve inside information Technical Analysis?
Unless you know the forthcoming quarterly earnings, or directly involved in the running of a business, or privy to confidential information, you are using indirect evidence to infer intent?
Without knowing the intent of bankers, directors, etc, you are having to use info such as Volume, size of transactions, movement of price, etc, as a one-step remove to determine the intentions of people directly involved, and to trade accordingly.
Problem is, you sometimes start to see patterns that don't really exist.
What are the most common market analysis methods, the most used and the most effective ?
Technical analysis is the forecasting of market prices by analyzing data and charts created in the process of trading. Its origins seem to refer to historical articles published by Charles Dow in the Wall Street Journal from 1900 to 1902. Technicians believe that some of the formations on the chart and the patterns will reflect the psychology of the market as a whole or a single share in key turning points. This is based on the basic assumptions that prices are changing in a directional way. The basic principle is that market prices already reflect all necessary information (including external factors such as economic, fundamental and news events), so you just need to know the historical behavior of the security to predict its future behavior. Technical analysts believe that prices also tend to repeat themselves because investors collectively seek model behavior. Because investors collectively repeat the behavior of those investors who preceded them, technical traders believe that recognizable (and predictable) price patterns will be seen on the chart. This is a short talk about technical analysis.
Can it be considered nonsense? I am sure that it is not. Technical analysis shows good results in normal trading. Then why is technical analysis sometimes wrong? Because black swans often appear in the market, swans are unpredictable events that break an ordinary cycle. So, technical analysis must necessarily be combined with news analysis, as the main assumption, that market prices always reflect all information is incorrect in case of unpredicted events.
You lost the plot at the end ..................... good stuff in black text, excellent conclusion in green text, but rotten and irresponsible conclusion in red.
Technical analysis is never wrong. When it appears to fail, its the failure of the practitioner, not TA. We just don't know enough. The right course of action right after you say "TA shows good results in normal trading" is not to sh*tcan the subject but to explore why it fails in black swan events. Therein lies the juice of the next step.
The black swan events you mention are none other than events based purely on Price called Wave corrections. We get them wrong because WE don't undertand the subject. Its laffffable to say News controls Price. The correct thing is, Price generates News"
Technical analysis is intuitive. Look at any market-place - when people see the prices of fruit rising fast, they at first buy more fruit before it become more expensive but later they stop buying and keep hold of their cash, as the price is now too high. And if the stall-holder takes prices even higher, the people with fruit start selling on their own and under-cutting him and this can force him to make his fruit cheaper.
But when people see the stall-holder is knocking down the price of his fruit down every 5 minutes, they again hold onto their cash because they can see that in 5 or 10 or 15 minutes more the fruit will be cheaper than it is right now. But sometimes someone with a cart will try to buy all the cheap fruit without waiting for the price to fall even more: this can cause a race to get some fruit before its all sold and can cause prices to go up.
If you can understand this you can understand TA.
None of this depends on knowing anything about farming or the micro-climate in the fruit farms or the "fair value" of a fruit.
You lost the plot at the end ..................... good stuff in black text, excellent conclusion in green text, but rotten and irresponsible conclusion in red.
Technical analysis is never wrong. When it appears to fail, its the failure of the practitioner, not TA. We just don't know enough. The right course of action right after you say "TA shows good results in normal trading" is not to sh*tcan the subject but to explore why it fails in black swan events. Therein lies the juice of the next step.
The black swan events you mention are none other than events based purely on Price called Wave corrections. We get them wrong because WE don't undertand the subject. Its laffffable to say News controls Price. The correct thing is, Price generates News"
having worked at hedge funds and investment banks alongside traders building systems for them, I can publicly state they don't use technical analysis. They use various modeling techniques and fundamentals for their trading. Technical analysis is primarily a retail trader approach to the market
having worked at hedge funds and investment banks alongside traders building systems for them, I can publicly state they don't use technical analysis. They use various modeling techniques and fundamentals for their trading. Technical analysis is primarily a retail trader approach to the market.
when snb removed the peg causing a black Swan. it had nothing to do with any wave, it was a reaction to central bank actions.