Mr. G
Well-known member
- Messages
- 259
- Likes
- 3
My tuppence (not an averaged tuppence, nor 1/3 or 2/3 of a tuppence, nay even a spread 'twixt tuppence and sixpence, but a whole, at-the-market tuppence) on this debate for anyone who cares to read:
I believe WS is genuinely trying to help people with reading and understanding the markets and some (most?) of his inter-market analysis is insightful, accurate and useful. It, I'm sure, can be used to trade successfully. He doesn't appear to have ulterior motives when compared to others both on and off of this forum that sell 'services' of one description or another; he seems willing to share his time freely and without commitment. I am not, nor have I been, a subscriber to his service but get the sense, through PMs with him in the past, that it could be a useful learning tool - after all, I've probably spent more than 6 months worth of subscriptions on trading books over the years.
That said, and from my perspective this is the crux of the debate, WS does seem to 'dodge' a number of questions that require binary answers. Talking as someone who works for an IB, and notwithstanding the fact that most IB traders are a bunch of egotistical tw*ts, I would expect that when a question is asked a simple answer is given rather than referring to previous answers, questioning the understanding of the questioner, and so on. It is this type of reaction that creates doubt and uncertainty in people's minds.
At the end of the day, everyone is free to make their own decisions (apart from me, the current Mrs. G tells me!) and a £50 punt on the service doesn't seem the worst thing anyone could do in order to see if they can get benefit from it. Arguably, someone could blow their account up as a result but I would venture that if someone needs to subscribe to a service and then blindly follow it they are likely to blow their account anyway, irrespective of who's service they are buying.
So, if WS really wants kudos/recognition/praise (or whichever other non-egotistical word he would prefer) then, in my opinion, he needs to be clear on exactly what he is doing and how he describes it. When I talk to my traders, that is what I get - clear answers to clear questions - and I expect nothing less as confusion leads to losses.
Eschew obfuscation!
Good thread btw; opinions are what make a market.
I believe WS is genuinely trying to help people with reading and understanding the markets and some (most?) of his inter-market analysis is insightful, accurate and useful. It, I'm sure, can be used to trade successfully. He doesn't appear to have ulterior motives when compared to others both on and off of this forum that sell 'services' of one description or another; he seems willing to share his time freely and without commitment. I am not, nor have I been, a subscriber to his service but get the sense, through PMs with him in the past, that it could be a useful learning tool - after all, I've probably spent more than 6 months worth of subscriptions on trading books over the years.
That said, and from my perspective this is the crux of the debate, WS does seem to 'dodge' a number of questions that require binary answers. Talking as someone who works for an IB, and notwithstanding the fact that most IB traders are a bunch of egotistical tw*ts, I would expect that when a question is asked a simple answer is given rather than referring to previous answers, questioning the understanding of the questioner, and so on. It is this type of reaction that creates doubt and uncertainty in people's minds.
At the end of the day, everyone is free to make their own decisions (apart from me, the current Mrs. G tells me!) and a £50 punt on the service doesn't seem the worst thing anyone could do in order to see if they can get benefit from it. Arguably, someone could blow their account up as a result but I would venture that if someone needs to subscribe to a service and then blindly follow it they are likely to blow their account anyway, irrespective of who's service they are buying.
So, if WS really wants kudos/recognition/praise (or whichever other non-egotistical word he would prefer) then, in my opinion, he needs to be clear on exactly what he is doing and how he describes it. When I talk to my traders, that is what I get - clear answers to clear questions - and I expect nothing less as confusion leads to losses.
Eschew obfuscation!
Good thread btw; opinions are what make a market.