The aim is to trade it so you lose no matter who wins the underlying event, Going green. Green representing the colour of your P&L when you can't lose.
Euro_d said:I would certainly not lay their tips for the simple reason that one winner at 10 wipes out 10 lays!
The odds are just not a viable proposition to lay.
Personally I think the lay idea is one worth exploring further and was one of the main reasons for starting this thread.
To date I have not seen any convincing arguement that would lead me to attempt lays.
IMHO it is simply too risky.
Dave
Isn't one strategy to back them with the bookies and lay them on the exchange?
Scripophilist said:The wonder of these markets are there are no transactions cost, you only pay commision when you lose and even a loss isn't necessarily a loss. If only the stock market worked the same way.
Not 100% correct Sir, however, I agree with the point in principle.Trader333 said:If you do that then you will lose almost every time. The bookies always give worse odds than the exchanges and you would have to lay at higher odds than the bookies so your net position would be a loss.
The only time this would not happen is if you have placed bets some time in advance of the event.
Paul
I do not know of anyone who has attended his courses, I assume you mean the betting exchange course?pratbh said:Has anybody here attended Scripophilist's (aka Peter Webb) course offered at http://www.glomtc.com/betexch.htm? I have asked Peter for more information in a PM, but would appreciate any independent review on this.
Thanks.
Agreed and in addition there is the hassle of having to open numerous accounts. The exchanges offer all from one platform.Scripophilist said:The economic payoff of trawling other odds hardly compensates for the speed and total exchange experiance IMO.