Mike,
As I have pointed out to "Shakone" the whole theme on this particular thread is slanted towards any one who seeks to PM another member with regard to helping them out is to regard them as being up to no good.
Anyone can PM anyone else to help them out. At no point in any of my posts have I even suggested that there is anything wrong with this. T2W exists for the very purpose of members helping one another out. However, it has to be done in the correct way. George's way is the incorrect way and I have explained why in the clearest terms possible on at least 4 occasions in this thread.
You have said yourself in point 2 above that the PM facility is there for members to communicate privately so i still don't see what all the fuss is about if George offers to do so by that means.
You've only made reference to the first half of point 2. The second half reads:
"However, it can be abused - and has been abused in the past - and T2W has a duty of care towards its members to try and prevent further abuse in the future." I then elaborate on this from point number 7 onwards. Please re-read them carefully.
I wouldn't mind knowing if you have statistics which show how many complaints T2W has received from members to indicate that they are being scammed in this way. I only mention this because if the percentage is of serious proportions then the moderators should consider withdrawing the PM and email aspect from T2W. Just a thought.
The PM facility has nothing to do with the Mods. It is there at the discretion of admin' and, as far as I'm aware, there are no plans to disable it. However, as I've made clear repeatedly, we do have a duty of care towards our members as, sadly, some people will abuse this facility.
Also, as explained to Shakone when I have started threads on T2W I have always explained in great detail what I am doing as I only use simple strategies and not complex ones that apply to George's theories. The point I am making here is that I am a genuine person who seeks to profit from FX and I share my own strategic information freely in crystal clear terms.
I'm very glad to hear it.
I don't want to get into arguments about whether George has not explained something correctly or backed up his theories on a public forum. George is George and one has to accept him as he is. He is more passionate about FX than any one I have ever talked to on the subject. As I have said before if George's prerogative is that he is willing only to take a few of us under his wing then I feel so fortunate that he offered to help me.
There is no argument about whether or not George has explained his theories publicly. He hasn't: that's a simple fact. His passion, skill and expertise all amount to zilch, nada, nothing if he isn't prepared to share it
publicly for the benefit of
all members. A ten year old who doesn't understand the difference between bid and ask can post on here and claim to be passionate about forex and give the impression they're some kind of guru. In the absence of clear explanations backed by practical examples of how they can be applied to the markets - such claims are utterly worthless.
Let' me be very clear here. If George does provide full explanations backed by practical examples of how to implement his ideas and then, unprompted, a member chooses to send him a PM asking a question - that's absolutely fine. That's what the PM facility is for. But that's a completely different kettle of fish from implying he has knowledge - but is only willing to share privately via PM. The latter is completely unacceptable. I'll wager that everyone bar you, George and possibly Dick understands and accepts this very basic point. In any event, it's forum policy. Those who breach it will have their posts reported and the Moderators will take appropriate action.
Also, as I have said before any one being persuaded to decline his help will miss out on improving their trading.
I am not trying to persuade any member from getting advice from George, you, Dick or anyone else. If they choose to do that - good luck to them. However, (and this is 'official' T2W advice), they would be well advised to conduct due diligence and do everything they can to ensure that the person they seek advice from is going to be able to provide them with whatever it is they want to know at a 'price' they can afford. Important: please note that 'price' need not be payment necessarily, it might just be hard work on their part. (In other words, I'm
not accusing George of being a closet vendor.)
Maybe all this doesn't fit into T2W's Community Constitution but it seems a great pity to me that some new members will not benefit from his experience.
If George posts his ideas clearly on the public forum then many members will be able to do exactly that. Why he chooses not use the facilities available for the very purpose for which they are intended is precisely why he's in such hot water at the moment.
Once again I do thank you so much for dedicating time and effort to respond to us both.
I won't be much longer as, the more this goes on, the more convinced I am that it's just a wind up designed to waste my time. However, it has provided the opportunity to explain what the issues are so that new members unfamiliar with the way community forums like T2W work, now have some insight which will, hopefully, leave them a little wiser and mindful of the proverb:
'fools rush in where angels fear to tread'.
Tim.