CYOF
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,114
- Likes
- 32
MMTrader said:trying to pick tops and bottoms!
Another very good answer, but not my view.
Question:
What is the quickest way to Lose Money in The Trading Game :?:
Thank You.
MMTrader said:trying to pick tops and bottoms!
Crap Buddist said:OK maybe ? this is better.
Pole is me , straight up :!: ,the pole has no brother beside heaven :idea: ,nor sister beside hell :idea: , do not rush up to heaven's brother :!: else ye be visiting sister's in hell :!: . :idea:
That is the quickest way to lose
Discuss. no, think :idea: for to be told 2+2= T,no W , no A, noT aint no good for the soul :idea: :idea: :?:
wasp said:Its not going to be 'buying options' is it, please no.
No, it is a very simple question, and as I stated, similar to Master Mind, or Who Wants to Be A Millionaire, I will give the answer, which is My View, when someone posts a reply that is very close to my view.
Crap Buddist said:Okays we now entering the realms of the dutch mind controls the wonderfuls tecniques me and my goods friend henks buiilds to help us all find the answers to all lthe lifes questions by investigatin or the knowings that the often times in the questions we say what is its with in itselfs?
As an examples of which is now heres belows, thus
we take this questions, quickest ways to losing ?
we now apply using the wonderfuls of dutch mind controls techniques instantly becomes the knowings thus below this is the beings slowest unplanned route from the win.
This is very powerfuls techniques and always gives the answers which is in itself. :idea:
CYOF said:No, it is a very simple question, and as I stated, similar to Master Mind, or Who Wants to Be A Millionaire, I will give the answer, which is My View, when someone posts a reply that is very close to my view.
Some replies to date have been along the line of my view, but not precise enough, and too general, so, with that, they did not constitute a correct answer in line with my view.
Thank You.
Crap Buddist said:Okays, henks wants for to me to show the peoples the powerfuls of the wonderfuls further with the dutch minds controls .
as we have solve the problems of the quickest ways to the losings we further using the wonderfuls of the dutch mind controls take the questions and this is the very wonderfuls questions for alls the wonderfuls traders in the worlds to find the answers in.
Okays the dutch minds controls next wonderfuls questions is..
way to take the mosts from the wins ?
okays so now we have the questions ,henks now applying the powerfuls & the wonderfuls techniques of the Dutch mind controls to find the answers to the wonderfuls questions..
The techniques remembers are so powerfuls it is within itself the question yes the wonderfuls answers and they never wrongs too and thats whats so powerfuls & wonderfuls ?
thus the powerfuls & the wonderfuls and this is powerfuls and wonderfuls answers to the question
from unplanned least to the lose
Okays please maybe some wonderfuls members would like to try themselves with the powerfuls & wonderfuls of the dutch mind controls.
dc2000 said:" I have a strategy" - Charles Ingram
cough cough
"I do not mind taking the odd risk now and again.
"My strategy has been direct so far - take it by the bit and go for it.
"I've been very positive, I think.
"I do not think it's a gigabit, I do not think it's a nanomol or megatron. I am sure it's a googol."
cough
Googol Googal Ka-Gool
CYOF said:Again, a very good reply, but not my view, so the answer is No.
And to add, the two Golden Rules presented by P.O.P, the Phantom of The Pits, in my view, are a must for any serious trader, and Rule No.1 is of paramount importance, always.
Thank You
tightstops said:got to page 6 of this thread and got tired of reading (cyof saying no your answer is wrong every 2nd post didnt help) no doubt all the usual cliche's have been mentioned my question is - was cyof's answer any more interesting than the usual answers to this question and what was it. thanks in advance for saving me time and sanity
timm said:The quickest way is to trade an instrument with a large spread. You have lost money as soon as you are filled. You don't need to wait for the market to move against you.You can close immediately to be sure of a really good loss.
Can we have Question No.2 now please?
Kiwi said:The quickest way to lose money is to stand back from your charts, decide which way the market is going, and then enter a trade in the opposite direction with tight stops. Repeat as long as you are enjoying the activity.
JTrader said:All a trader needs is greed and indiscipline and failure is sure to follow.
trendie said:but the answers on those shows are objectively true, and not the views of the shows hosts!!
all the answers that have been given so far are "in the view" of the posters. the fact they dont coincide with your views, does not invalidate their answers.
You pose what appears to be an objective question, but your responses are personal views.
You should rephrase the question as:
What in CYOFs view is the quickest way to lose money at trading?
Glenn said:Out of this comes an answer for the thread starter.
To lose money quickly, don't manage your risk.
However it may not be his answer ------ yet.
Glenn
trendie said:but the answers on those shows are objectively true, and not the views of the shows hosts!!
all the answers that have been given so far are "in the view" of the posters. the fact they dont coincide with your views, does not invalidate their answers.
You pose what appears to be an objective question, but your responses are personal views.
You should rephrase the question as:
What in CYOFs view is the quickest way to lose money at trading?
new_trader said:CYOF,
What sort of time difference is there between the "quickest" in your view Vs the ones given so far?
Eg/ X number of traders with the same amount of equity start trading. 1 trades using your view of the quickest way to lose money and every other trader uses 1 of the views given so far.
Are you confident the one trading your view will always blow his/her account first?
Is this just your view or is there statistical/empirical evidence to support it?