I can't see why people object to paying bankers the bonuses they are contractually entitled to. This is a classic case of caveat emptor - the banks should have made sure that their bonuses were structured in such a way as to avoid rewarding failure. People don't clamour for footballers who have underperformed, resulting in their team's relegation, not to be paid, and the situation with bad traders is no different. Let's just hope that lessons have been learned, and in future bankers are rewarded for sensible, but not excessive, risk taking.
Jeff