Is a great trader one who can be judged by their bank balance at death or retirement, irrespective of the journey... Or is it those for whom the journey is the key?
Many 'greats', alive and dead, have vast sums and made a fortune in the markets. As FXSCALPER has pointed out elsewhere, we don't know the progression of each trader but taking Livermore for an example, we know his account fluctuated wildly to say the least.
So what is 'great'? An (eventual) rich man or one whose yearly statements would make your bank manager fap vigorously?
We will never know just how people like buffet got to his current status? A few lucky punts making all the difference or if he progressively, consistently made a strong growth over the years.
For me, a great trader is not one who makes the odd killing and vast sums but could lose it the next day, it is the consistency that counts. The consistency shows not only a solid grasp of money and risk management which are vital, but one who constantly, day in and day out, make a solid % return.
Anyone of us could have shorted GBPJPY at a grand a point in July last year and made £8,500,000... Does that make us a good trader? The trader then may go on to lose for the next 6 months as the market doesn't move so beautifully!
If someone was to produce a trading statement with the above, and another that made only half the amount, but they had a +60% strike rate, trading every day or couple of days, using sensible risk and money management, who would you rather invest with?
How many of the 'greats' fit in the latter category?