Well Guys your begining to freeking me out... Their is a way to know their financial solidity, SB clientes numbers and so???
I've some tousands pounds theire, and would like to be sure my noney is safe!!
Aren't you too dramatique forecasting a closure with such a confidence?
These SB companies are Market Makers, as long as you cover up for the margin required, the deposit shouldn't be a problem. If the SB company have good internal risk management system, in the case your funds have been used up, they will act quickly with a margin call and close all the positions. You are making a bet, why should you be asked for more on the account, besides margin requirements? Some kind of minimum deposit I do understand, but not in these numbers. I don't think GFT is giving you interest on the money deposit, which is not allocated by positions? I feel it is better for the client, not being able to deposit this kind of money, as you sign up for the first time. If you are not an experienced trader, it is easier to trade in too high a stake, if the money is available on the account. I feel one must be able at least, to try out a SB company before depositing any larger sum of money. If GFT feels for the clients from a money management point of view, they should offer bets in a lower stake. This is someting I think all the SB companies should address, in order to give a newbie a fair start trying out SB. Live trading with real money is the only way to learn how to handle loss and winnners, and the emotional issues that comes along with that.Right, let's focus on the topics.
I would just add this thought: Isn't it necesary to put some entry barriers to the SB business? It's a question more than an afirmation.
Even if I think that 2.500 US$, Is surely a too hight entry point, but asking a minimum level of 1.000 Pounds would surely make thinking and forced some of the new comming to the market to do more research, planned strategy and so on before openning a real account. I think that less people would be blow out of their economy if a higher level of economic comitment was asked.
And to the question if this is a good economic strategy or not for the GFT firm, we would need some statistics about how much get a SB company from 1 client with high economic comitment in front a client who do that just to try. I mean GFT surely open less account than this competitors which don't ask for such amount of money, but I'm also quite sure that each account opened will give them more money on a long run.
I'm a newbie to the forum so I don't suppose my recommendation counts much but ...
Very impressed with GFT. Opening an account was a bit of a hassle but the spreads are good, the margin requirement is excellent and the support has been excellent. Trading is better than other sites (apart from IG which is also excellent), never been faced with being unable to trade when I should be able to.
Margin requirmeents seems to get too little attention but its huge to me. GFT are the best with IG close behind. CityIndex and Capital Spreads etc are dreadful in comparison (~7 times as much margin required on the UK100)
GFT is also the only one apart from IG where you can trade directly from charts (even if it doesn't work properly).
Trade from the charts with IG? That's news to me? I've not noticed this feature - are you sure, if so how do you access this? cheers
Judging by the replies to this thread, it appears not many people are interested in GFT.
A year ago, I used their Dealbook 360 software to trade forex. Not impressed with them because they would hold a trade in the pending window for a minute and then fill at top of the spike. During that time, you had no way to cancel the trade and you were completely at their mercy. If they can't fill you immediately, at least they should give you the ability to cancel. But they don't because they know that they can make money easily off you this way.
Judging by the replies to this thread, it appears not many people are interested in GFT.
A year ago, I used their Dealbook 360 software to trade forex. Not impressed with them because they would hold a trade in the pending window for a minute and then fill at top of the spike. During that time, you had no way to cancel the trade and you were completely at their mercy. If they can't fill you immediately, at least they should give you the ability to cancel. But they don't because they know that they can make money easily off you this way.
Dealbook is good compared with most SB platforms but has a few glitches with charts.
It's good at taking your money with the delayed execution I mention above.
Did you query this with them?
Could it be due to the fact, that the minimum deposit for opening an SB account i quite high? At least that is the case when it comes to open a CFDs account.