I will own up to being the one that said "news is baked in the cake" I still believe that and that is my opinion but I want you to know that I value your opposite opinion. What is important here is that this is a long term strategy. If a trader is looking for consistant weekly results, this EA is not for you. You have to look at this on a 3-6 month basis. I have been trading this since 9/15/10....I stopped trading it 12/14/10 and restarted 1/17/11. At 12/14/10 I was somewhere around +400 pips. There were news events during this time period as well and still profited so that is why I discount news for the FMT.
I did not endure the drawdown for december becasue my experience was not to trade this time period because of lower volitility and liquidity which we at least need volitility for this strategy. My advice for those trading FMT is to put a trade size that you can live with and go to sleep everynight without worry. Know that a 70% winning system you have the probability of 8 losing trades in a row....drawdown is part of trading. If you are trading 2% per trade you have to accept that at sometime you have the potential of an 16-20% drawdown. Trading greater than this could mean the possibility of a significant drawdown. In this same example, 5% risk per trade could give you upto 40% expected drawdown although the opposite reward would be worth it, a smart trader cannot allow this to be a possibility. When your trading account is drawn down by 25% you need to re-evaluate your strategies. FMT is so far profitable for me so I will continue until it proves differently.
I am still actively trading the FMT with a 2% risk per trade...I have 1 winner and 2 losers and 2 breakevens for the month with my broker. I am down but it is not a disaster month...My advice is to reduce your trade size to level you are comfortable with and continue to evaluate. If you don't stick to something you will continuosly be jumping around to different systems. Again, I like the FMT because it is not blackbox and that you can trade it manually. It is simply a profitable strategy in the long run, but you have to be around to trade another day when you lose. Risking too much per trade will drain your capital account to a level that you cannot recover. Compound your winnings with a small risk per trade and in the long run you will be profitable. Keep changing and tweeking the system and you will lose because you are not being consistant.
I understand what you are saying. But my point is, and for some reason up until now it was falling on deaf ears when I tried to explain it earlier in this thread.
When anyone has done a back test or even mention stop values that have been changed along with changed take profit targets. There remains one major NEW issue that has become very important in this new global market.
That we have up to until today fail to mention or take notice of. This one important element that has gone either unspoken or un-noticed that really just started to take shape at that start of 2009 till now.
The Asian sessions in the past were used to consolidate price action which occurred over the London and US session.
But we now have a “new player” in this global game a player that can turn the markets and shift market moods all by itself, and that ‘player” is China.
We now are having major News being released out of China at around 9:00 PM NYT, which can shift the markets moods and cause trend changes, But even worse is the early news release out of China which did not really exist or have any major impact before 2009 has caused what was once a quite Asian session to become more volatile and make the trading ranges far exceed that 40 or even a 50 pip stop used by FMT.
I once tried to explain that good news out of China more than likely would cause the GBP/USD to really as risk appetite would pick up and investors even on a short term basis would seek higher yielding currency and investments and use the dollar as a carried trade ,even it it meant just base on over night moves.
But if news out of China was bad for their economy investors would run to the USD as a safe haven and the flows would cause a shift change, again it may just be a short term change , but enough to kill any FMT trade, and remember that during the days when China news is scheduled for release that more then likely the trading ranges will be wilder then normal.
This topic is beyond this thread, but anyone who keeps over looking this major point will have trouble going forward.
Same can be said for any major moves caused by the prior day, why would anyone take a counter-trend trade today, when we had such a BAD GDP number out of the UK last night, and also given the fact again as we can see the Asian session had a 61 pip range? With the bottom of the range at 1.5774 with over night rejection at 1.5808, even before the FMT Long trade issue.
We need to think a little and not just follow blindly after any of the above events have happen the day before and we are about to take a counter trend trade. Will this always work NO.
But it will improve our risk reward if we use some common sense, maybe like tonite Long trade signal, we could think about buying into a pullback and decrease the range size and thereby improving our risk reward.