CavaliereVerde
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,778
- Likes
- 2,703
It seems a textbook scam backtest.
Backtest error with tick data suite.This was pulled from another forum. It might be worth a forward test:-https://bit.ly/2OLxTI
Thanks. I haven't even looked yet. I'll look on my TDS to double check.Backtest error with tick data suite.View attachment 296474
The only reason I have an interest is there are 9 months forward testing on a real account and I thought there was an opportunity to forward test it for myself. I've reached out to the author to see if there is a bug free version available. Authors of scam systems aren't going to allow others to forward test it without payment, so let's see!!!It seems a textbook scam backtest.
I have a better one 🤣
So you should go to your chart and correct every trade on a gap over any weekend in the last 15 years, any holiday or other reason fo that a market could be closed or run into a gap or high spread, for example because of news releases. The demo ignores it, not only the backtester.
Then you come a few steps closer to reality.
The reality for me is I do not even release backtests until I have at least a three months forward test on a real account and I do not take the three months seriously beyond an indication that the backtest maybe valid should the statistical properties of both backtest and forward test fall within certain thresholds. I would be willing to bet a chunk of money that "Trading for Darwin ILR with 20.75% profit from December 2020 to February 2021" is no longer available by December 2021 whereas the 69% return system below continues to perform in a similar manner and the max DD continues not to breach 11%.I have a better one 🤣
View attachment 296569
sorry, it's the German MT4. 😁
But this is also your problem with backtesting if you hold open positions when the market is closed:
View attachment 296568
The tester does not handle any gaps properly.
MT4 does not check the market data when closing a position on tp or sl.The funny thing is that a correct value was calculated for the equitiy, but not used for closing the position. Closing is always on tp or sl value, even if it is complete nonsense. This is the equity chart for the situation above:
So you should go to your chart and correct every trade on a gap over any weekend in the last 15 years, any holiday or other reason fo that a market could be closed or run into a gap or high spread, for example because of news releases. The demo ignores it, not only the backtester.
Then you come a few steps closer to reality.
I do not release any backtests but for showing errors because I don't have any intention sell an EA or to support a seller. This backtest was published to show in a discussion in another forum that MT4 backtest cannot be relyable because of the rror in opening gaps. If you don't know this error you're cheating with your results.The reality for me is I do not even release backtests until I have at least a three months forward test on a real account and I do not take the three months seriously beyond an indication that the backtest maybe valid should the statistical properties of both backtest and forward test fall within certain thresholds. I would be willing to bet a chunk of money that "Trading for Darwin ILR with 20.75% profit from December 2020 to February 2021" is no longer available by December 2021 whereas the 69% return system below continues to perform in a similar manner and the max DD continues not to breach 11%.
It should be a matter of work pride not to release backtests with a data quality of less than 90%, ideally 99.9%. It has been years since I've seen a data quality of 30%.
I've hidden the names of the MYFxbook portfolio. I am not trying to sell you anything.
Have a great weekend all.
You're right, I will change the figures in my signature from time to time, maybe monthly.I would be willing to bet a chunk of money that "Trading for Darwin ILR with 20.75% profit from December 2020 to February 2021" is no longer available by December 2021 whereas the 69% return system below continues to perform in a similar manner and the max DD continues not to breach 11%.
Data quality is completely irrelevant for the MT4 calculation error in backtests.I do not release any backtests but for showing errors because I don't have any intention sell an EA or to support a seller. This backtest was published to show in a discussion in another forum that MT4 backtest cannot be relyable because of the rror in opening gaps. If you don't know this error you're cheating with your results.
Data quality is completely irrelant for the MT4 calculation error in backtests.
Your MQL5 link is broken or is removed recently where this EA was offered for a higher 3 digit amount in USD. But Google does never forget 🙂
View attachment 297328
You're here since January 21 and the same or similar stuff was offered on other forums since about the same time, not only for discussions.
You're right, I will change the figures in my signature from time to time.
And I take the challege, let's see whether you 69% return and a DD of less than 11 % will be still available with your trading at the end of this year. Let's see whether my trading results will be better than your's are now or end of this year.
Maybe you didn't get it: data quality does not remove the calculation error for gaps in backtest.1. For me, this is nonsense especially since I mostly use A.I. components which can be extremely sensitive to data quality (garbage in, garbage out) but we can happily agree to disagree.
It's your link. I didn't write it's your EA 😉Your MQL5 link is broken or is removed recently where this EA was offered for a higher 3 digit amount in USD"
2. It isn't my EA
Great.Challenge excepted.
I do not release any backtests but for showing errors because I don't have any intention sell an EA or to support a seller. This backtest was published to show in a discussion in another forum that MT4 backtest cannot be relyable because of the rror in opening gaps. If you don't know this error you're cheating with your results.
As you want to run it on your live account, post your results of the live account after a month or at least 100 trades of the live account and the TDS backtest for the same period or number of trades.Most serious algo builders use robust backtest add-ons to run backtests such as Tick Data Suite (TDS). TDS does not suffer from this issue if simulate live trading is selected, by default these settings are always used when I perform backtests. I reached out to Birt so he could put it in his own words and so I do not have to debate whether water is wet.
eareview.net support on Sat, 6 Mar at 3:15 AM
Hi,
In the Advanced tab of the Tick data settings dialog you can find a group of settings called Simulate live execution. Basically if you want your orders to execute as they would at the broker (i.e. at the post-gap price instead of in the middle of the gap) just enable all four checkboxes.
Best regards,
Birt
Ok, buddy. I can accept it.As you want to run it on your live account, post your results of the live account after a month or at least 100 trades of the live account and the TDS backtest for the same period or number of trades.
I'd also appreciate if you compare the MT4 backtest (can be done from the live account) and the TDS backtest by publishing the results.
Live account results are the only arguments which count, or better: real profit on a live account.
Can you accept this?
I don't want to change this thread to a discussion about backtest, seller of backtesting software, errors intentionally not solved by Metaquotes (paid by brokers, made for brokers), cheating EA sellers and programmers optimizing the EA for a certain period and a certain asset without knowledge of all the problems for potential buyers, differences between brokers and markets, limited trade sizes and all the other stuff around that. Ok?
Do you have any live account results you can show us after a month including a comparision to the demo and TDS results?Ok, buddy. I can accept it.
Hi.Do you have any live account results you can show us after a month including a comparision to the demo and TDS results?
Attached: live results from Feb' (the month the EA was posted in here) and TDS backtest covering that period. Apologies, the BT starts in December so you will have to filter.Do you have any live account results you can show us after a month including a comparision to the demo and TDS results?
The following EA is free of charge. Google it.Attached: live results from Feb' (the month the EA was posted in here) and TDS backtest covering that period. Apologies, the BT starts in December so you will have to filter.