I also believe what I say about fiat money and stores of wealth.
Owning physical gold is fine, but the paper stuff has been used to manipulate the market prices and not in a good way.
They are no longer relevant, the markets price mechanism is screaming at us that they are being replaced, they are obsolete.
I read that article Tim but still hazy on the energy/$cost required purely to transact in Bitcoin. Aiu, miners are chasing the creation of Bitcoin and transaction fees, the guys running wallets/services etc are chasing transaction fees. Those guys put aside what does it actually 'cost' for the transaction to take place? Does it require a problem to be solved as per mining it for example, or is it simply numbers transfered from one account to another?I copied and pasted into Google the part of darktone's post I've quoted in red and there were a ton of results. This article is top of the list: One Bitcoin Transaction Now Uses as Much Energy as Your House in a Week.
Watching the (rather depressing) video that Mike posted and reading this article - I struggle to see how Bitcoin can grow and be sustainable. Given its complexities and the difficulties that the average wo/man in the street has in understanding it - there's no future for it as it stands IMO. Note the emphasis. I quite see that there's a future for some sort of digital currency - I just don't believe that Bitcoin is the one. Perhaps Iota or Ripple or . . . .?
Tim.
Is a long read tar, and theres some valid points but is obviously written by someone with a very negative view of crypto, and a seemingly poor understanding of money.Bitcoin: the World's first decentralised Ponzi scheme
14 December 2017
Let's try to explain, in simple terms, why Bitcoin and other digital pseudo-currencies will fail.
Is a long read tar, and theres some valid points but is obviously written by someone with a very negative view of crypto, and a seemingly poor understanding of money.
'Governments no longer guarantee the exchangability of their currencies for gold, silver or other rare atomic elements. They instead issue "fiat" currencies, basically IOUs'
They dont, they have given that privilege to the banks. Just like the rest of us, the Government borrows its money.
'No, it's not a currency
To be viable as a currency, something must be both a medium of exchange and a store of value. These are mutually independent criteria: one cannot be satisfied from the other.'
By that description you could argue that fiat isnt a currency as its been a very poor in the 'store of value' department.
Perhaps if Bitcoin does nothing more than seed public interest in the subject of 'money', itll be a win of some sort and I might get a like from Oscar cheesy:
Fine by me , you want to call fiat a ponzi thats fine as well , and by all means dont store your wealth in fiat , i always tell peeps to invest and hedge in multiple assets and not to leave all their money in fiat .
But all of that doesn't validate the stance of bitcoin , its even irrelevant , if something is wrong that doesnt make the other option right by default .
96% of WSJ economists say Bitcoin is a bubble [ http://www.forexlive.com/news/!/96-of-wsj-economists-say-bitcoin-is-a-bubble-00-20171218 ]
"If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck," said Diane Swonk, founder of consultancy DS Economics.
"The news of new highs seems to beget more action and a new high-a clear sign of a bubble," said Amy Crews Cutts, chief economist at credit-reporting agency Equifax.
"Now that deep envy has set in amongst those who do not own bitcoin it seems this mania can enter the final stage; one which can exist for quite some time before panic and crash come into play," said Constance Hunter, chief economist at accounting firm KPMG LLP."
but they don't know 5_h!t, here is a conspiracy theorist instead, he knows it all.
So your logic is to compare unrelated historical events where the outcome was unexpected for the vast majority. What exactly are the odds of any given event of significance resulting in an unexpected surprise? I bet you can't give a number on this but it's okay to use it as evidence to an argument. Wouldn't it be prudent to at least know your odds before throwing your weight behind it? You are basically expecting a given outcome without considering an alternative outcome.96% of the establishment said Brexit would be a bad idea. Still happened though didn't it !
Ditto Trump.
So your logic is to compare unrelated historical events where the outcome was unexpected for the vast majority. What exactly are the odds of any given event of significance resulting in an unexpected surprise? I bet you can't give a number on this but it's okay to use it as evidence to an argument. Wouldn't it be prudent to at least know your odds before throwing your weight behind it? You are basically expecting a given outcome without considering an alternative outcome.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Of course, fortune telling at its best. You seem to have experience in this department. Amazon crystal ball or argos?It wasn't unexpected at all [emoji38]
That's the difference between "those in the know" and "the herd"
Wait wait.... Nope, nothing there, not even am ounce of regret or bitterness.As usual, the readers comment are the best part.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42386893
Nocoiner:
A Nocoiner is a person who has no Bitcoin. Nocoiners (usually Socialists, Lawyers or MBA Economists ) are people who missed their opportunity to buy Bitcoin at a low price because they thought it was a scam, and who is now bitter at having missed out. The nocoiner takes out his or her bitterness on Bitcoin Holders, by constantly claiming that Bitcoin will crash, is a scam, a bubble.
As usual, the readers comment are the best part.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42386893
Nocoiner:
A Nocoiner is a person who has no Bitcoin. Nocoiners (usually Socialists, Lawyers or MBA Economists ) are people who missed their opportunity to buy Bitcoin at a low price because they thought it was a scam, and who is now bitter at having missed out. The nocoiner takes out his or her bitterness on Bitcoin Holders, by constantly claiming that Bitcoin will crash, is a scam, a bubble.
How many coins do you have?
None.
Not sure how many times I have to say "working on strategies" but i'll get involved when all prep work done and not before.