higherSelfishness
Active member
- Messages
- 103
- Likes
- 9
I didn't use which is the case, because neither may be the case.
That is a brilliant point, of which I lacked the wherewithal to mention before.
I suppose what I wanted to have said is "who says it's one or the other?"
There is something called the binary fallacy: “If not 1, then 0. Since 2 is not 1, 2 is 0.”
That is to say -
If the universe operates as an open system (not enough gravity to pull everything back together again - it just all spreads out and we emerge and disappear as some event that occurred randomly, some 14 billion years ago), then it cannot exhibit the characteristics of a closed system (the universe sustains an unending cycle of big bangs and big crunches - an oscillating unvierse.)
And vice versa.
Well, I believe . . . it is both.
Guys, listen to me. . .
The Answer. Is Always. BOTH. Inasmuch, might I be bold enough to declare the Market both "IS" and "IS NOT" affected by your order?
. . . and, by the way . . .
Who The F(#() Here is playing for $1 per pip? WTF are you doing!?!? Put an entire paycheck on an account
And then do it again,
and go!
It may also be that you have fully tested it, that the market isn't affected by your order, and that you simply don't trade the strategy properly.
In your experience it is forgivable you would account for this example as a possibility.
But my experience, which is the most valid and really is all that matters says that such "possibilities" you refer to just weren't the case.
See, there is no evidence more potent than the anecdotal. Stats don't mean a damn thing against what is truly experienced.