besttraderalive
Junior member
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 1
an edge is knowing when to get in a trend and when to get out a trend
Kin ell dunno fer fooks sake mate bud :whistling. Its not rocket science tbh cba bud bless...
And no, I would not call the lower time frames random noise. I'd be surprised if anyone who made money trading thought that they were. Those that claim to and don't, on the other hand, I can easily see why they might take comfort from the thought that market movements are random noise...bless
I knew it... something in my brain told me "that's not a gorilla, it's something else" but I didn't reach the right word.
It was only about six months ago that I finally worked out the difference between tortoise and turtle, I must have been off the day they explained that at school.
an edge is knowing when to get in a trend and when to get out a trend
6 days a week is too much, or are there other reasons you go?
Pump Iron 3 days ,Group Cardio Workout other 3 days . Love it6 days a week is too much, or are there other reasons you go?
6 days a week is too much, or are there other reasons you go?
I dont have an edge that im aware of.
Guess you need a good sample of trades to evaluate whether you have something.
I keep hearing people say 200 odd trades is a decent sample..??....
Im up to 60 trades on my latest style.
Maybe i'll evaluate my results in a few months when I have lots more trades under my belt....
Do you add journal-like entries in your spreadsheet to help correlate your trading success with your decisions?
I document each trade on my excel spreadsheet which also states why I entered the trade.
Is that what you mean?
cheers
I’m obviously in the minority here thinking trading journals and trading performance statistics are a complete waste of time.
I didn’t always of course. Back then I was told they were the secret to success. But no matter how hard I obsessed over the journal and however much time I spent on it, my trading method didn’t actually alter that much for the better. What little time I could spend trading, as maintaining and enhancing that journal was a top priority.
Same with performance statistics. Got almost OCD with them and created legions of spreadsheets to compile, assess and compare my various trading ratios and data. What with these and the journal, my trading had to move full-time, although the trading itself was still taking a back seat to this vital administrative endeavour.
Then I noticed that even as I changed my trading systems, for the better, it took an awful long time for the accumulated crap trades that preceded them to allow the performance to show the improvement themselves. Imagine a downward plunging equity curve and how much good news it’s going to take to turn it around. Downright discouraging. So I started re-engineering my performance data from a more recent point in time. Bit like Lloyds drawing a line under ‘Titanic’; and starting again.
When I looked back over my journal I realised I’d been concentrating on the wrong things, and had spent a lot of time noting down and annotating the notes about the wrong things. It was a fine journal though. I even considered having it bound. Giving up on it seemed almost sacrilegious, especially after all the effort.
Eventually though, I realised I had used these devices as a diversion to avoid recognising that what I was doing was not working. And neither the performance stats nor the journal were going to make it better. So I stopped. Got rid of it all and concentrated on my core business, which is trading, not journaling my trading and not monitoring the stats of my trading.
You are better off simply staring at a screen, discouraged, unhappy, bone weary and on the point of giving up, than you are thinking you’re making some form of progress by diligently writing up your journal or compiling your stats. You will eventually gain more of an insight through the former than you ever will through the latter.