LongVision
Well-known member
- Messages
- 310
- Likes
- 616
ERQ has another problem with its micro VaR and its success for investors. The trader wrote that he moves 55 or 65 lots on the investor accounts when he enters a trade. There are only two ways to increase VaR: increase lotsize or increase time in the market.Let's compare with the great ERQ that also has very low VaR in its underlying 0.33%.
What do you think?
Everything as planned.Just a reminder.
@Pure Pip Producer is banned from Darwinex Forum
@Emanita is allowed to answer about her darwin PDC .
the crash
Here is one with a new definition of the VaR:I've been disconnected for some days, too busy at work, and I confess I'm a bit sad for the end of this Darwin because it was funny the guy behind and all the controversy around, though it was bitter at times.
Well, the fate of the Darwin was crystal clear from day one. Specially for all the nonsense theories that were supporting the logic of the Darwin. Pure crap but really funny. And the most funny was the crowd investing on it. And of course, finally the crash.
I don't feel sorry, as I read on a previous post, for anyone affected. The investors deserve it. There was no cheating nowhere; not even from the owner of the Darwin, you can not say a clown is cheating you. No meaning to offense, just wanted to illustrate with an example. Anyway, if you make your own due dilligence, decide to invest and lose; so you lose, that's the beauty of the game. You find what you deserve. Darwin's rule 😉
I hope the guy (sorry I don't remember his nickname) comes back very soon with new Darwins and crazy theories to continue the amusement.
a new definition of the VaR
Ok. Not a crash but a great success. Congrats!Here is one with a new definition of the VaR:
Where do you see a crash?
the crash @FXforfun Look at this pic and explain where do you see a crash ??? : A crash is when we crash an account to zero. This account (and the other one) is positive. It has been stopped because of Darwinex VaR (monthly numbers of trades), not because of something else. All the...www.trade2win.com
It is. We have improved a thing and discovered a new thing.a great success. Congrats!
The replication factor fell from 10 to 5 from the IPO. To make it back from 5 to 10 will put us in the case where our pips won have less value than our pips lost.In this case why were they stopped?
They were not stopped, they stopped the Darwin themselves with their own strange reasons.Ok. Not a crash but a great success. Congrats!
In this case why were they stopped? I thought it was because they were losers.
Loser definition: It loses money
do the same thing over and over again and always expect a different result
Hey! Good question. Well, my Darwins sucks but I don't try to explain with any kind of excuses why are they losers. Period. Same as yours. Well, probably not so ugly, but mine have stagnations unacceptables.Once again, where is YOUR track-record @FXforfun ?
So, if i understand well, other traders can offend me, but me, i must shut up, because you have decided it can only go one way.Try to avoid to offend other traders.
Good luck for you trading and your next darwin.
@Pure Pip Producer
You are no allowed to post in this thread.
I see a crash in the number of investors and assets under management for the past three months.Look at this pic and explain where do you see a crash ??? :
We were the most invested in our Darwin PDC, so this is biased...I see a crash in the number of investors and assets under management for the past three months.
View attachment 295452
There is no need to change the subject. Allusive questions cannot help to argue on the subject.Do you have something against different people, opinions, points of view?
Sure? I'm not. But I have a new nickname for you: Poor Pip Producer.I’ve started to strike back because i was attacked first.