But surely this doesn't work if the cause of the drawdown is a faulty trading methodology? I could just sit and guess on the ways the different pairs will move and never be right. My big problem (one of them... :innocent was that I lost faith in the system. For the record my drawdown with Concept was 40%, and I buggered up a speculative trade betting £15 a pip instead of £1.50. The two combined put a dent in my confidence and my bank.
/Phil
My point was based around the fact that your account suffers a 30% drawdown and then starts to recover... If a new high is never made on the account then technically the account is still in drawdown? In other words, if the account suffers a 30% drawdown, recovers slightly but not enough to make a new high and then suffers further losses to take it below it's prior low then the max drawdown would have to be expressed as a loss greater than the initially expressed drawdown of 30%.... make sense?
Yes, I get your point.
Phil - You say that your drawdown was as much as 40% (net of 8 losing trades)? But when you established your bank the plan was to be able to absorb upto 20 losing trades? (ie 20 x 5% = 100% of the bank capital). In other words, if you only wanted to risk 40% (in cash terms) of your bank size then you should have calculated what 40% of your total bank size was and then divided that number by 20 to establish your risk for each trade.
Steve.
I think that's an essential point. It's hard to keep faith when you have no idea how a system works and what its normal operation parameters are. Many people struggle even to stick to systems they developed themselves.If I'd developed my own strategy I might have been able to last a bit longer.
I think that's an essential point. It's hard to keep faith when you have no idea how a system works and what its normal operation parameters are. Many people struggle even to stick to systems they developed themselves.
Hi all
I do get regular updates from this vendor telling me of good profits being made and high percentage wins
at the risk of being shot down in flames....what is the system (loosely) based on - ma's ?
N
Not a clue m8. As a former customer and loser I'd stay well clear. Unless you have a shedload of cash to risk. The results on the website, posted since august 2008 are, by and large, accurate. But they are based upon a bank of £25k. Take into account the initial purchase cost and the annual fee of £500 then you'll need a big bank just to break even. I had 4k in mine and I never broke even.
The current owner mailed me recently offering another "system" I replied asking for scans of verified account statements. The reply to this suggested that I call so they could "sort me out with some copies". Now in all fairness I never did, despite this offer. BUT other cos. have links to live accounts or statements online.
It's your money.
/Phil
All I will say is this;
The system makes money but you have to follow it. Yes there will be draw downs especially during your bank building phase where your money management is slightly more agressive. Only risk what you know you can afford to lose. Pretty much everyone who moans about this system stopped trading it when it went into a draw down - they didnt have the bottle to continue so they stopped and the started trying to justify why they'd stopped. Never once did I see anyone else post a trading plan. If you have a plan then you have something to fall back on when the going gets tough.
The bottom line is that the system works and makes money. It's not a 'get rich quick' scheme.
Steve.
Concept's results for 2010 so far are not too bad. Anyone still in?