lurkerlurker
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,482
- Likes
- 150
Fair enough.Well i`ll wait and see if i can get a good , honest reply .
Nobody so much as implied you were.It`s not as though i`m attempting to defraud them
That is the point.i`m simply trying to deal on a price created by them and the market
Yes - the market / their quote would have been at that level at the second you clicked. Is it your fault that they intentionally delay the execution by passing your trade to a human and then intentionally refuse the trade based on price action subsequent to your attempt to deal? When a firm can decide whether to offer you your (best?) execution after the price has moved, it gives them an unfair advantage unless they accept every price which was a fair price at the instant the buy or sell button was clicked. Who cares if it takes the dealer a few seconds to check the price - you should be able to rely on getting the deal if the platform displayed a price, the price was fair (ie not an off market rate), and you were dealing in less than their size. This is how it is at other spreadbetting firms. If they complain that the delay stops them from hedging, then they should reject trades where the price has moved on so long as they do not fill trades when the boot is on the other foot..I know there will be many hundreds if not thousands attempting to deal at the same price , but the price was indicated and it was the speed of execution which caused the "Price no longer valid " ticket .
True enough, but they will only improve when it suits their bottom line. I think they used to be a good company, but from what I have heard the customer service and execution isn't so good any more. Hopefully they can get their act together.I`ve been trading 20 years and used an IB platform previously , the tax advantages of SB were appealing . It`s a pity the literature doesn`t match what it says on the packet .Initially i found their service very good and customer service excellent.Now as the customer base increases both are faltering . It will reach a saturation point and the churn rate will increase rapidly if they don`t improve on some of the points mentioned .
Can i ask some others who use CS to show some solidarity if these problems persist .I intend to close the account if this doesn`t improve quickly ,can i ask others to follow suit at an agreed time and date. This isn`t anything personnel against Simon or CS as i`m sure they`re not just targetting me and it`s a general issue which needs to be fixed quickly
It isn't personal - it is business. If they can't or won't execute you properly, then it makes sense to trade elsewhere. I agree with Oanda's website about transparency in execution.
For any type of trading, best execution comprises three essential factors:
1. the best price (least displacement from the quote)
2. the fastest execution (to capture the moment of opportunity—without the delay of dealer intervention)
3. the fastest settlement (for traders, to maintain the flow of capital; for market makers, to avoid operational and interest-rate risk)
[my emphasis, from Oanda.com]
Unfortunately I can't join you in the en masse account closure - I closed mine back in October. If I had an account with them and was contemplating closing it for these reasons, I'd be happy to go along.
I don't know if we will here from Simon again now that the tone of the thread has turned. I just wish they could see that quite a few of their clients are having problems not getting executed. If you can't trade, they don't make their spread. What is so difficult about offering decent execution? Most other SB firms manage it okay.
I've had a few requotes with CMC, but never a deal rejected and sometimes the requotes have been in my favour. This only happens in a fast market. I've never missed a trade with IG, or City Index. TradIndex don't even appear to have a mechanism to refuse a trade.