I recommend you learn Elliott wave theory. I have been studying it for almost three years and it is the best thing I have found. In my experience it is not a perfect thing in itself, but it goes really well with other things like candlesticks...
Hi. Can you relate EWT to reality, or rationalise it? I'd like to stress that I'm not being obstructive - I just find a lot of TA very difficult to absorb.
eg Kirkpatrick & Dahlquist Ch 20, first page: "EWT is based on the notion that the market behaves in an irregular cyclic manner. Proponents of EWT believe that this cylic structure is classifiable and predictable."
If it is "classifiable and predictable" it surely cannot be "irregular cyclic" and even less could it be merely "irregular"?
In the next paragraph:
"Because Elliot's theory defies any strict, mathematical description, except through anecdotal evidence, its existence is difficult to prove conclusively."
This kind of thing is incredible to read. I bought this book in good faith, to broaden my horizons.
I'd like to stress that I am not criticising you as a contributor here for advocating EWT - I'm venting my frustration at TA literature which is mostly incomprehensible to me.
Further, if anyone can explain (in terms of maths, physics, empirical trading behaviour, or even economics, or indeed otherwise (apart from another TA theory)) what extrapolative trendlines are actually meant to signify, I would be truly delighted to hear from you.