Well bangkoker, this is possibly the key question As discussed elsewhere the last few days, a system based on random chance must eventually fail: in fact it doesn't really fail, it's just that it starts to, quite randomly, give outcomes poorer than they were in the preceeding period. And it will just as surely revert again to giving great results and the cycle will begn again.
The true Holy Grail system will be one which takes advantage of the mechanics of the market, which the market cannot change. I don't say Big Ben is this system, but it builds on rational behaviour of the market. It's hard to conceive that a market can see a dramatic increase in volume (on opening) without a dramatic increase in volatility: it's surely just as logical that this volatility will be driven to limits by tenative and testing trades by the market participants and these levels will amount to support and resistance. Break-outs should then follow the classic pattern of dramatic penetration, followed by support reverting to resistance and vice versa. Should be plenty of scope to play such scenarios as long as profit targets are not too far out and stops not too close in.
Anyway, a fun game so far.
The true Holy Grail system will be one which takes advantage of the mechanics of the market, which the market cannot change. I don't say Big Ben is this system, but it builds on rational behaviour of the market. It's hard to conceive that a market can see a dramatic increase in volume (on opening) without a dramatic increase in volatility: it's surely just as logical that this volatility will be driven to limits by tenative and testing trades by the market participants and these levels will amount to support and resistance. Break-outs should then follow the classic pattern of dramatic penetration, followed by support reverting to resistance and vice versa. Should be plenty of scope to play such scenarios as long as profit targets are not too far out and stops not too close in.
Anyway, a fun game so far.