P
Time to lick some juicy p***y now
Hasta la vista
BEAR market gradations of pain, torment, distress and torture
Special announcement:
Spain has broken out and is leading the charge north in Wave 3 of Corona Virus Pandemic.
I therefore believe that at any time now, FRANCE which is on the verge of taking out a sub-wave high will join Spain north in Wave 3.
Then the rest of Europe will follow. This includes the foolish Swedes who thought they could fool BEAR.
Years from now they will say, "we should have paid attention when the United States spiked higher and the others did NOT - because now they will play catch up"
Lord have mercy. The ferocity of BEAR is jut being unleashed in a Wave called El TERRIBBBBBBLE in Espanol
Get Trader333 and Sharky to the underground bunker, NOW.
For Tomorton ......................................... our discussion on Iraq last year. Here's even better evidence by your own
Research from the Defence Studies Department, King's College London
Iraq: not the first British disaster … and it’s unlikely to be the last
Dr Chris Tuck
Slam Dunk!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fibo's point all along at T2W or anywhere else where Brits and Americans are in the same unit of time and space, certain absolute fundamental f***ups ALWAYS occur .................... and the root cause is spotted by Fibo long time ago and confirmed by the Chilcot enquiry ...................... excerpts ..................
I have taken the liberty to include my own title to the 2 excepts below:
Fibo asks the UK, "who is your daddy?"
the second cause is external, and it was the priority accorded in British calculations to the ‘special relationship’ with the United States.
Shaping Blair’s belief in the necessity of action was the second theme: the influence of the United States on British policy considerations. The Chilcot report concludes that the UK’s relationship with the US was ‘a determining factor in the Government’s decisions over Iraq’. This influence is a long-standing theme in British foreign policy. But what the inquiry also illustrates is that, time and again, British influence over US decision-making was minimal. Britain’s shift towards involvement in the Iraq war was influenced powerfully by the Blair government’s belief, as Chilcot notes, that supporting the US over Iraq was necessary in order to sustain cooperation in other areas; and that the UK could best influence US policy towards Iraq ‘from the inside’. But generally, Blair’s government proved unable to exert a decisive influence on the US – indeed, the reverse was true: by prioritising relations with the US, British policy was forced by degrees into alignment with that of the US. As Chilcot illustrates, despite Blair’s post 9/11 commitment that the UK would stand ‘shoulder to shoulder’ with the US, he was keen on reigning back the US focus on military options, preferring instead a gradualist approach that would maintain international support and that might at some point look towards regime change. Progressively, however, in attempting to reign the US back, the UK was instead simply dragged forwards. Blair’s long note of 28 July 2003 included the phrase ‘I will be with you, whatever’. This phrase was contained in a missive whose general thrust was a desire to slow the US’ moves to the military option; but it also expressed a general truth about the realities of the British position. The Chilcot inquiry notes that, in 2003, Britain should have adopted a more questioning attitude. But whether, especially post-Brexit, Britain would be in future be more willing to risk a rift in Anglo-American relations is a matter of debate.