Baruch said:MSN? :?:
sorry, msn messenger
Baruch said:MSN? :?:
Anonymous said:There is a problem which companies face when employing employees in sensitive positions, it is commonly known as mental disorder. If that employee holds a sensitive position like punching numbers or characters or messages which can be read worldwide through a terminal, and that employee suffers a mental breakout like insulting others online, it is highly possible that that employee may disseminate very undesirable information over sensitive equipment like the internet.
So if that employee is really employed by any company which he or she claims to be, and is in that sensitive position to create sabotage through the computer, it will be very necessary to know if that employee is really in that company, because if that employee abuses clients information it can be very disastrous.
As an example, if a trader trades purely based on news only, and he subscribes to a news service company which employs a mentally disturbed IT professional, and that employee disseminates untruths through the news feed, what is the trader really doing when he trades by relying on the news only?
Baruch said:Did anyone trade the UK trade balance? Strange action - in my view.
PS. First came the move. And then came the news from Dow Jones. Bad.
sccz97 said:this move in not out of the ordinary for this figure when comparing to recent moves. gain capital have intraday tick data spanning a few years. You will be able to go back and see all the moves and dteremine your trading strategy for each figure as the moves are different for each.
Baruch said:OK. But it was on your list? Can anyone use that data from Gain Capital? Did you trade the number?
sccz97 said:yes, this is one of the figures on my list altough I do not consider it a major uk figure for my strategy. I think anyone can use the data from gain capital. I can't vouch for how clean the data is.
http://ratedata.gaincapital.com/
sccz97 said:forgive me if this is obvious but, your point is ....?
JP1966 said:The main reason for the short lived bounce is thatt he ONS put out a statement with the figures that implied the improvement was due to a one off adjustment it had to do becuase of a fraud.
This is usually a great figure to trade, if it is out of line, in my view.
Baruch said:Yes, I can read it on the newswires. Did you trade the number?
JP1966 said:Yes.
Baruch said:OK. Could we get some more details? (I didn't trade the number, because I was watching if Dow Jones was out with the number before the move - they were not. I should have gone in with the reverse, but didn't).
JP1966 said:Wasn't trying to be awkward but can't really see the point of putting up actual trades. Was happy to say I lost Friday etc but generally don't put up trades as anyone can post up 'real' trades, make out they are the worlds best trader but I don't think it adds any value.
I bought it on the figure and sold higher up. I have not trade since and so I did not go short it as it fell back or bought it when it fell back and bounced.
JP1966 said:Too slow to pay the 24 or 26 offer but managed to get some in at 28.