Lickyluciano
Member
- Messages
- 91
- Likes
- 11
Anyone have ideas what possible causes this?
Looks like it was a nice proper short squeeze, then it hit someone's target (coincidentally, looks like C$9, like the analyst said) and people started selling. Someone also shorted quite a lot of this at around C$8, so clearly there's a bit of a round numbers thing happening here.
Yeah, precisely.Sorry, I'm not getting you. Isn't a short squeeze when a stock is going up and the shorts are forced ti cover thus pushing the price higher?
Looks like it was a nice proper short squeeze, then it hit someone's target (coincidentally, looks like C$9, like the analyst said) and people started selling. Someone also shorted quite a lot of this at around C$8, so clearly there's a bit of a round numbers thing happening here.
Yeah, precisely.
Anyone have ideas what possible causes this?
I gave you the answer here. You're not paying attention.
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/stocks/150192-333-increase-52-weeks-itp.html#post1856112
IMO, you are in over your head. Best to close out with a profit.
Peter
When I say short squeeze, I am not referring to the latest leg down, but rather to what preceded it.A short squeeze drives the stock higher not lower. The stock is down not up.
When I say short squeeze, I am not referring to the latest leg down, but rather to what preceded it.
It doesn't... The fact that it traded all the way to someone's target (maybe someone was listening to that analyst after all) might.I know you meant that but how does that explain the sell off the last 2 days.
It doesn't... The fact that it traded all the way to someone's target (maybe someone was listening to that analyst after all) might.
Your post #10 in this thread...You mean the article from Forbes who said its in oversold territory? What analyst?
Peter; I appreciate your input. I am trying to understand the behind the seems physiology of such price action
I suggest you don't and act on what you can see.