shakespeare515
Active member
- Messages
- 134
- Likes
- 6
I really don't like this 1 trade a day concept that's taught to wannabe traders. I can cherry pick a trade that i 'think should' bounce or breakout with all the possible conditions in my favour, however what this ignores is the element of 'luck' every trader needs for each individual trade to work. Yes, 'luck'. What happens if you get unlucky on an individual trade, but then an equally good one pops up the next hour, you have to sit it out because you've done your one trade for the day and had a bad break, consequently missing the huge move later on??
The only advantage i can see is for the extremely undisciplined of novice traders who are trigger happy. But other than this one +ve, this concept will lead you down a road of disappointment when reality doesn't match your perception, i.e. you lose when you've just spent 3 hours trying to pick the 'perfect' trade. No one knows what will happen over 1 trade, but if you've got a statistical edge and discipline to execute without fail, then over a 100 trades you should fare better. But this means catching moves and no one knows when they're going to happen, therefore you have to take each one which match your entry criteria, not just one.
I agree JRP,
The number of trades is not important as percentage loss. stopping after a certain number of trades makes no sense to me, stopping after being down 2% for the day makes a lot of sense to me..
Sam