charliechan
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,008
- Likes
- 119
Remapping NFPR.....
......
from some posts on another thread......
socrates said:
Originally Posted by SOCRATES
That is very helpful tsuntzu, but you realise it is only helpful at an academic level and not at a practical level. At both levels, I may add, the NFPR serves to baffle nearly everybody as no matter what is declared, the market then goes on to do what the market does, good figures or not.
Its only use is to know the date and time of the release in order to be prepared for whatever happens at that point in time, and nothing else.
tsuntzu said:
Probably this discussion would be better served in the merits of NFPR thread. That aside we will have to agree to disagree on the level of helpfulness of this figure. I wouldn't go so far as to say it is the figure release i look forward to the most, but I generally find the market reaction to the component breakdown fits the underlying market expectation and sentiment at the time. I guess it comes down to the time scale over which you judge the market to have priced in its significance. With the sentiment at the moment fixed on the hourly earnings and the employment rate, the headline number is almost second tier in comparison.
charlie says:
i tend to agree with socrates on this one in the short term (due to my awareness/thoughts of the true nature of the market)....
in the immediate moments after the release, there seems to the untrained eye to be 'just' noise (where as it isnt noise as others are fully aware of - this is where i think socrates is coming from) but after a while when the immediate business has been done the market takes its course as tsuntzu points out.
i am interested though in the comment that.... 'after the components of the release have been digested....'
this suggests two components at work. those with orders and objectives immediately after the report, and those who are calculating and digesting the components before they make their minds up - ie the trend setters. BUT, their success in this will be much determined by the activities of the first group.
are there 2 groups? it could well be the same group - especially if you understand the 'noise'
these scenarios are not limited just to nfp, but most major releases. in fact, some quite modest numbers can cause a stir if the number is not quite what was expected.
any comments, remarks, suggested medication welcome......
......
from some posts on another thread......
socrates said:
Originally Posted by SOCRATES
That is very helpful tsuntzu, but you realise it is only helpful at an academic level and not at a practical level. At both levels, I may add, the NFPR serves to baffle nearly everybody as no matter what is declared, the market then goes on to do what the market does, good figures or not.
Its only use is to know the date and time of the release in order to be prepared for whatever happens at that point in time, and nothing else.
tsuntzu said:
Probably this discussion would be better served in the merits of NFPR thread. That aside we will have to agree to disagree on the level of helpfulness of this figure. I wouldn't go so far as to say it is the figure release i look forward to the most, but I generally find the market reaction to the component breakdown fits the underlying market expectation and sentiment at the time. I guess it comes down to the time scale over which you judge the market to have priced in its significance. With the sentiment at the moment fixed on the hourly earnings and the employment rate, the headline number is almost second tier in comparison.
charlie says:
i tend to agree with socrates on this one in the short term (due to my awareness/thoughts of the true nature of the market)....
in the immediate moments after the release, there seems to the untrained eye to be 'just' noise (where as it isnt noise as others are fully aware of - this is where i think socrates is coming from) but after a while when the immediate business has been done the market takes its course as tsuntzu points out.
i am interested though in the comment that.... 'after the components of the release have been digested....'
this suggests two components at work. those with orders and objectives immediately after the report, and those who are calculating and digesting the components before they make their minds up - ie the trend setters. BUT, their success in this will be much determined by the activities of the first group.
are there 2 groups? it could well be the same group - especially if you understand the 'noise'
these scenarios are not limited just to nfp, but most major releases. in fact, some quite modest numbers can cause a stir if the number is not quite what was expected.
any comments, remarks, suggested medication welcome......
Last edited: