Zupconite betting system 100 % profitable

Well its certainly a different approach. Got to commend you for that ;-)
 
nothing annoy's me more than people comparing gamblimg with trading.AS for increasing your lot size after every loss to make up that loss.That translates into greed for me.Have we not all been warned of getting greedy time after time after time.Whenever you are not responsible you are greedy.New traders do your homework before you take this guy's advice.Responsible risk for most people is about 1-2 % of capital per trade.Though some traders with 90% winning trades takes risk a little larget than that.Always be responsible or your trading career will be short lived.
 
nothing annoy's me more than people comparing gamblimg with trading.AS for increasing your lot size after every loss to make up that loss.That translates into greed for me.Have we not all been warned of getting greedy time after time after time.Whenever you are not responsible you are greedy.New traders do your homework before you take this guy's advice.Responsible risk for most people is about 1-2 % of capital per trade.Though some traders with 90% winning trades takes risk a little larget than that.Always be responsible or your trading career will be short lived.


Well said Christiaan - now just keep your head down. Incoming!
 
nothing annoy's me more than people comparing gamblimg with trading.AS for increasing your lot size after every loss to make up that loss.That translates into greed for me.Have we not all been warned of getting greedy time after time after time.Whenever you are not responsible you are greedy.New traders do your homework before you take this guy's advice.Responsible risk for most people is about 1-2 % of capital per trade.Though some traders with 90% winning trades takes risk a little larget than that.Always be responsible or your trading career will be short lived.

I do not advise anybody to trade the Zupconite.I would not use it myself , but for a need for a consistent equity curve.I do not want to sit for two years and see no profits.The green lines on the graph below last up to two years showing a flat performance .The chart shows the performance on non Zupconite systems.

Look at the equity curve on the graph below.The system is very profitable without using Zupconite.By applying Zupconite on a small portion of my account , the equity curve should look like the white line + 2,500 points a year added = the red line.There is no free lunch in trading , traders have to risk money to get the reward of a beautiful. equity curve.


Look at the equity curve of a Zupconite sub system.All Zupconite systems have similar equity curves.:cheesy:

New INEXPERIENCED traders have to first get their systems /methods in order before even looking at Zupconite.ZUPCONITE is only for highly experienced traders capable of using it.

O D T
 

Attachments

  • 2004 to 8.jpg
    2004 to 8.jpg
    86.8 KB · Views: 217
  • cab l.gif
    cab l.gif
    6 KB · Views: 202
What's the atomic mass of Zuconite? Is the picture you're displaying it's half life? Does it emit alpha, beta, gamma or a mix? I'd be interested to understand how it decays and when it becomes safe to handle.
 
What's the atomic mass of Zuconite? Is the picture you're displaying it's half life? Does it emit alpha, beta, gamma or a mix? I'd be interested to understand how it decays and when it becomes safe to handle.

The drawdown of Zupconite is 2500 points on the old system, if using it on a small proprtion of your account.The picture does not display the drawdowns , because all the scaling down variations on the improved version are too complicated to program.It should become safer to use , after 10 consecutive losses on a standard system, staring a betting sequence at minimum possible position size.:cheesy:

Now why was I betting up thinking I was buying or why was I betting down thinking I was selling? .Now I am getting caught up in this deluded casino.
 
Is the picture you're displaying it's half life?

The yellow lines is how the mass on equity curve should look , if a good version of Zupconite is applied.The yellow line could look a lot better on the troughs.
 

Attachments

  • 2004 to 8.jpg
    2004 to 8.jpg
    89.9 KB · Views: 216
I heard that Zupconite is the active ingredient in ladies cosmetic products, you know the ones that make crows feet go away. It's Zupconite Hydroxide.
 
This is how I used the Zupconite on the Dax breakout system.

After 4 losing trades ,the fifth and sixth trade recovered the losses and gave a profit.

Please do not use this betting sequence ,as it is only for professional gamblers with plans to down scale position size.
 

Attachments

  • dax breakout system mm.jpg
    dax breakout system mm.jpg
    117.8 KB · Views: 282
nothing annoy's me more than people comparing gamblimg with trading

Then you must live a charmed existence. For most of us there are probably hundreds of more annoying things than this irrelevant issue.


Paul
 
If you have a system with a 50% hit rate,the sequence of losses and wins should in a ideal distribution be a loss followed by a profit,or a profit followed by a loss.

In chaotic distributions of losses and profits ,distribution can result in 20 consecutive losses or profits.How could you apply a betting sequence to convert chaotic distribution to ideal distribution?

What is your formula to convert distribution?What can you suggest?

I already have my own formula.
 
Here is the difference in mass drawdown equity curves between Zupconite betting method and martingale betting .The martingale betting blows your account.The zupconite does not blow the account , unless used recklessly

These are two different types of betting methods , one cleans you whereas Zupconite helps in trading.

The charts are for sequence of 21 losing trades
 

Attachments

  • zupconite pro.jpg
    zupconite pro.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 197
  • martingale.jpg
    martingale.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 224
Good discipline to forecast what your system will do to you in 21 consecutive losers, however unlikely that might notionally appear. I respect the rigour, but still disagree with the basis.
 
Top