momothebored
Active member
- Messages
- 139
- Likes
- 1
1. Tell that to the top quant hedge funds. That's the dumbest statement i've heard
2. Even your interpreration of a chart is based on statistics. e.g. your silly MA/RSI model. You use it because you think there has been a past bias for that model to work. DUH?
3. Probability is a statistical concept, you DO realize that right? So when you take a trade, you do so because you think you're going to win. That's called, a STATISTICAL bet.
My God, you're a wannabe trying so hard. :cheesy:
I seriously do think you're one of the silliest, un-schooled wannabes i've ever met.
It's not just that you're horribly insecure, it's that you're horribly detached from reality.
For the 4th time, like i said, since you don't experience any serious draw-downs, make your Trillion like all good wannabes :clap:
Please don't talk about making $700 in 10 trades because that's PATHETIC beyond words.
People like you should be making $700 in 2 seconds.
2. Even your interpreration of a chart is based on statistics. e.g. your silly MA/RSI model. You use it because you think there has been a past bias for that model to work. DUH?
3. Probability is a statistical concept, you DO realize that right? So when you take a trade, you do so because you think you're going to win. That's called, a STATISTICAL bet.
My God, you're a wannabe trying so hard. :cheesy:
I seriously do think you're one of the silliest, un-schooled wannabes i've ever met.
It's not just that you're horribly insecure, it's that you're horribly detached from reality.
For the 4th time, like i said, since you don't experience any serious draw-downs, make your Trillion like all good wannabes :clap:
Please don't talk about making $700 in 10 trades because that's PATHETIC beyond words.
People like you should be making $700 in 2 seconds.
You're dancing around the fire my friend. Nothing you're saying is relevant.
Statistics is useless. It's just a theory. Something being executed purely statistically is useless because nobody knows the accuracy of statistics. People like to use statistics to make important decisions. Statistics can be used as a guide, but nobody knows how accurate it really is. Just because a problem seems impossible to solve does not mean that statistics is the next best thing. The fact that DNA testing is based off of statistic gives me the chills. Can I be given the death penalty soley because of statistics? Could a murderer be released from jail soley because of statistics?
Your point that "statistically x is impossible" makes me assume you never studied Statistics at all, because any statistics major knows that statistics is nothing more than a collection of data. There's no "law" or rule behind them. Statistically there's 50% probability of a coin landing on heads. That doesn't not guarantee you will get 5 heads and 5 tails after 10 coin flips.
It's absurd that you assume a proper risk management strategy leads to 100% or $1T. You sound like a typical home trader, who thinks everything is 100% or 0%.