So you can make a 1250% gain in 11 months but this cannot make you rich?
At the risk of going round in circles, I said that the blanket statement of "
every good trader should be able to make millions..." was incorrect in my opinion.
How many accounts did you start with to get that 800-10,000 statement? Just the one?
I've lost count. It took me around seven years to get profitable ;-)
You use this to show prospects but you don't want them so see Bisons 'cause it's unrealistic :whistling.
I use it as an illustration of what can be done not what will be done. I accept that my return is a good one but I would rather show it than Bisons anytime.
1,250% return is pretty far out there. I accept that. But his is almost
double the percentage return in
less time!
But put this aside for a second, you will no doubt understand that "prospects" are far more impressed with monetary returns than percentage returns.
I show them my statement and they think "What?! I've got to spend all my time learning what you do and I'm going to make only £9,000 in a whole year!!"
Then they look at Bisons and say, "that's more like it, £62,000 in nine months...sign me up"
you do see that makes little sense.
Try an experiment:
Show two statements to people:
Statement A: £1,000 - £10,000
Statement B: £10,000 - £100,000
Make sure that they realise the statements were produced over the same time, taking the same setups and using the same risk per trade.
Which one do you think is going to impress more?
Does it make sense?
