DionysusToast
Legendary member
- Messages
- 5,965
- Likes
- 1,501
Damn them 'experts'
The bods here on t2w who told him he didn't have an edge and that he was going to blow up. Shortly before he blew up.What experts ?
Yeah yeah yeah I'm boycotting t2w yada yada... but this was too lulzy to pass up and there's only one appropriate site:
The iplayer is here:
BBC iPlayer - Dragons' Den: Series 9: Episode 8
Go to 17:08 in. Watch till they're rejected.
Absolutely hilarious pitch by the property equivilant of Mr. Cohodas (well there's some tard from presumably kleneeze or something, but ignore them). There's even a flying analogy!
I just saw this and thought I had no alternative but to bring it to everyone here's attention.
p.s. delete all my posts you *****
p.p.s. how's howie doing? I have a pretty good idea given the last few months...
Go ahead and incontrovertibly prove the two premises of my post are not fact.
1. An incomplete understanding of the instruments you were trading.
2. Utter arrogance.
If you can't do so, they remain as fact.
Yes. Even if he refutes them.I know this is terribly troublesome, but if HC doesn't refute your premises, are they facts? Are you saying, eg, res ipsa loquitur?
No. My premises are always facts.Not disputing nor interested in the content, just the process. Without some other presumption, premises are not necessarily facts, right?
Yes. Even if he refutes them.
No. My premises are always facts.
Just what I was saying Richard, the ignore list.
The bods here on t2w who told him he didn't have an edge and that he was going to blow up. Shortly before he blew up.
Just what we need.
Peter
Where is your evidence that I blew up? Another of your contentions without proof. But then an evil habit is hard to break.
As scose is not here to check your spelling.
*On