By all means, I meant no "intrusion" whatsoever, but Grey1 insisted I continue my analysis, so that's what I did. If at any time people should feel this is not the place to do it, I'll take my charts back to where I had them before
I'm not here to distract people or convince them into becoming daytraders. I can only say that I have found the truth to be in the chart and not in whatever indicator or fundamental reading.
There is no such thing as a "non-technical day". People using RSI, CCI, MACCI and all sorts of indicators believe that when price is "overbought" or "oversold" it should respectively drop or rise.
It's no wonder they come to the conclusion "TA fails, it does not work".
When talking about TA, I am talking about TA
in its purest form, the actual price/volume behavior of the market or instrument, on the assumption that price reflects all factors before an investor becomes aware of them through other means.
I'd be more than willing to do this analysis elsewhere. I have posted these things in my blog, in the private board, in the public DOW thread. If ultimately people think it's not suited here, I'm okay with that.
As for making more dosh by longer term trading, that's an easy one. If I'm correct Grey1 is long from April 17 around 12500. He's now about 500 points in profit. A rather conservative trader I know about makes about half of the average daily range on the DOW (which has been around 200 points for the last couple of weeks). This means he'd have from 10 trading days x 100 pts = 1000 points profit. The more short term a trader plays, the more profit he can make. Anyone doubting this, should seriously consider having a look at what pure TA traders manage. There are far better traders out there than me who could show you this.